866-216-4126

Category: common law rescission

It's time to reassess the role of investment banks, originators, servicers and other players claiming "securitization" before the next foreclosure tidal wave.

July 10, 2020

Since foreclosures are about to start another meteoric rise, this would be a good time to write a new article on what went wrong the last time, what is going on now, and what is still likely to go wrong this time. * I know that some of the rantings on the internet seem like the spillage of conspiracy theorists and some of them are just that. But overall they are right. * The bottom line is that back in 1993, investment banks latched onto a scheme that had been partially developed by Michael Milken, who went to prison. The new

Read More »

How to Use the Real Deal On Securitization to Homeowner's Advantage

June 15, 2020

Like citizenship in this country litigation is not easy. We keep banging our heads against the same wall expecting a different result. We need a strategy that directly addresses the inescapable realities of every homeowner transaction and every securitization cycle. My substantive analysis of the transaction is that the homeowner was drafted into a securitization scheme which in my opinion clearly triggers quasi contract and quantum meruit — the only possibility for inquiring into the adequacy of consideration. Lawyers and litigants have shied away from this because of its complexity and because they don’t know how to approach it. * In simple

Read More »

TILA RESCISSION — Filling in the Gaps

February 1, 2018

Lawyers for homeowners are probably contributing to the confusion that the banks bring to the table. And Judges, despite the clear evidence in the public domain that the banks committed millions of illegal acts, nevertheless take the word of banks over the word of a homeowner. Let us help you plan your rescission strategy: 202-838-6345. Ask for a Consult. Register now for Neil Garfield’s Mastering Discovery and Evidence in Foreclosure Defense webinar. Get a Consult and TEAR (Title & Encumbrances Analysis and & Report) 202-838-6345. The TEAR replaces and greatly enhances the former COTA (Chain of Title Analysis, including a

Read More »

Short Explanation of TILA RESCISSION vs Common Law Rescission

December 13, 2017

Quiet title is a lawsuit not a motion. It must be worded correctly to fulfill the elements required for the court to consider the demand for quiet title. Otherwise it will be dismissed. For quiet title to apply the mortgage must be void not just unenforceable. TILA Rescission is a statutory remedy that is different from common law rescission. Sending of TILA rescission notice by U.S. Mail means that delivery is presumed. If delivery occurred or is presumed the TILA Rescission is effective. Just the opposite in common law rescission based upon fraud. At common law, sending a notice of

Read More »

Search Our Blog

Subscribe to our Blog!

Categories

Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339

Scroll to Top