CLASS ACTION FORM: HAMP and UNJUST ENRICHMENT

class_action_against_boa1_kahlo HAMP

Editor’s Note: Excellent Pleading on HAMP, TARP and related matters. They also bring up unjust enrichment which might also be applicable to the receipt and non-disclosure of third party payments.

Good facts on illicit “modification” practices and the reasons why the modifications usually don’t become permanent.

KAMIE KAHLO and DANIEL KAHLO, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BAC

HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
Defendants

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By: s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman, WSBA #12536
Ari Y. Brown, WSBA #29570
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 623-7292
steve@hbsslaw.com
ari@hbsslaw.com

Tags: Ari Y. Brown, BAC, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, Bank of America, BOA, BofA, class action, cOMPLAINT, FORM, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, HAMP, HERS, Kahlo, Steve W. Berman, TARP, UNJUST ENRICHMENT, WASHINGTON
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure mill, Modification, securities fraud, Servicer |