{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"LivingLies Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.livinglies.me\/blogs\/7095","author_name":"doadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.livinglies.me\/blogs\/7095\/author\/doadmin","title":"TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297: SCOTUS RULES ONLY CONCRETE INJURY GIVES STANDING - LivingLies Blog","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FyT59STm4e\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.livinglies.me\/blogs\/7095\/scotus-rules-only-concrete-injury-gives-standing\">TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297: SCOTUS RULES ONLY CONCRETE INJURY GIVES STANDING<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.livinglies.me\/blogs\/7095\/scotus-rules-only-concrete-injury-gives-standing\/embed#?secret=FyT59STm4e\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297: SCOTUS RULES ONLY CONCRETE INJURY GIVES STANDING&#8221; &#8212; LivingLies Blog\" data-secret=\"FyT59STm4e\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.livinglies.me\/blogs\/7095\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"This new case was decided by the United States Supreme Court about 3 weeks ago. It is extremely interesting on many levels. Basically the court was trying to shoot down the\u00a0 standing of consumers who were wronged by illicit behavior by the credit bureaus. And the court succeeded as it always does because it is [&hellip;]","thumbnail_url":"en-cache:\/\/tokenKey%3D%22AuthToken%3AUser%3A44094413%22+fc6309fa-ee7f-41d4-be5c-41ad14d399b2+e9713fce03ddd4e74e405549c39d8f69+https:\/\/www.evernote.com\/shard\/s303\/res\/c8f7bb76-8888-4fb8-a3ec-950b4b2caa0b"}