January 12, 2011

JUDGE SCHACK| Dismisses Case With Prejudice Against Citibank Due To Counsel Failure To Comply

JUDGE SCHACK| Dismisses Case With Prejudice Against Citibank Due To Counsel Failure To Comply – 2011-01-11 11:33:03-05 Citibank, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2007-SD3, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-SD3, Plaintiff, against Santiago Murillo, et. al., Defendants 16214/08 Plaintiff: Megan B. Szeliga, Esq. and Jenneifer M. MCann, Esq., Steven …

JUDGE SCHACK| Dismisses Case With Prejudice Against Citibank Due To Counsel Failure To Comply Read More »

REGULATORY AGENCIES AND ACTIONS: FULL COURT PRESS

COMBO Title and Securitization Search, Report, Documents, Analysis & Commentary SEE USING REGULATORY AGENCIES TO PRESS YOUR CLAIMS GRIEVANCE FORMS ARE USUALLY ON THE INTERNET SITE FOR THE AGENCY Any regulatory Agency that fails to conduct an investigation, or fails to find probable cause, or fails to prosecute its licensee for discipline or fails to …

REGULATORY AGENCIES AND ACTIONS: FULL COURT PRESS Read More »

LENDER DEFINED BY "SUI JURIS 249"

ALSO REQUIRED READING Remember, since your “lender” is just a servicer, they do not own the note. They do not have the right to enforce the note. They can only act as a servicing agent. Please refer to U.S. Code Title 12: Banks and Banking, Part 226 – Truth in Lending (Regulation Z). This is …

LENDER DEFINED BY "SUI JURIS 249" Read More »

TITLE INSURANCE: VIEW FROM THE OTHER SIDE

COMBO Title and Securitization Search, Report, Documents, Analysis & Commentary Submitted by Ron: SEE  title-companies-and-agents-brace-for-worst-year-of-their-existence SEE STEWART TITLE BULLETIN AFTER RON’S COMMENT BELOW See Ron’s Comment Below EDITOR’S RESPONSE: Ron’s comment is chock full of true facts. His problem is that he hasn’t caught on to the relevance. Will the title carrier pay or “fix” …

TITLE INSURANCE: VIEW FROM THE OTHER SIDE Read More »

REMIC AND UCC EXPLAINED BY "SUI JURIS 249"

FROM THE EDITOR: REQUIRED READING under FAS 140, the original lender sold it to the REMIC and forever lost their rights to enforce the note. the REMIC holds all the loans together into a pooling and servicing agreement. However, because they chose to avoid the IRS tax rules for double taxing, they pass on the …

REMIC AND UCC EXPLAINED BY "SUI JURIS 249" Read More »

Scroll to Top