CHECK OUT OUR DECEMBER SPECIAL! What’s the Next Step? Consult with Neil Garfield For assistance with presenting a case for wrongful foreclosure, please call 520-405-1688, customer service, who will put you in touch with an attorney in the states of Florida, California, Ohio, and Nevada. (NOTE: Chapter 11 may be easier than you think). Editor’s …
Featured Products and Services by The Garfield Firm NEW! 2nd Edition Attorney Workbook,Treatise & Practice Manual – Pre-Order NOW for an up to $150 discount LivingLies Membership – Get Discounts and Free Access to Experts For Customer Service call 1-520-405-1688 Want to read more? Download entire introduction for the Attorney Workbook, Treatise & Practice Manual 2012 …
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES CLICK HERE TO GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION REPORT CUSTOMER SERVICE 520-405-1688 2008 Legal Memo at BKR Conference Cautions Banks and Lawyers Against Lying About Ownership A legal compendium of cases published by the American Bankruptcy Institute establishes a pattern of conduct by Ameriquest, Wells Fargo and Chase dating back before 2008 …
Banks Slammed for Misrepresenting Themselves as Owners of the Loan Read More »
CLE SEMINAR: SECURITIZATION WORKSHOP FOR ATTORNEYS — REGISTER NOW SEE LIVINGLIES LITIGATION SUPPORT AT LUMINAQ.COM Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD Internal emails indicate Deutsche Bank knew they were bankrolling toxic mortgages by Ameriquest and others iWatch In 2007, the report says, Deutsche Bank rushed to sell off mortgage-backed investments amid worries that the market for …
Here is a direct link to this particular “Trust”… http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001352650&owner=exclude&count=40 The PSA is contained within the 330 page Prospectus (424B5). I have not found any of the other relevant “Purchase Agreements” … This “Trust” has quit reporting to the SEC in 2007 yet is still actively providing monthly payments to the Investors according to the …
This RMBS “Trust” has quit reporting to the SEC in 2007 Read More »
a special relationship may exist between defendants, who possess specialized knowledge and experience in the field of mortgage refinance, and plaintiff, a homeowner without any training or education in mortgage refinance. Based upon the parties’ vast difference in knowledge, there are issues of fact whether plaintiff’s reliance on defendants’ misrepresentations was justified. (See Fresh Direct, …
Rescission: Equitable Estoppel Validated in 2006 Case Read More »
