65% of Fresno Judges Have MERS on Their Own Mortgages

EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the part of this mission that I love — when people start getting proactive and shining the light where nobody from the dark side wants it. It just so happens that there are several Judges around the country that have consulted with our analysts regarding their own mortgages. In MOST cases these Judges do not hear mortgage cases, but not all. I know for a fact that several of them are considering strategic defaults despite the obvious political consequences and perhaps because of them.

But be careful here. The way this information is being used in Court right now is that lawyers are researching the same things that this person did and then using ANOTHER home a few houses away from the home of the Judge to use as an example. The Judge hears the address and it doesn’t take him or her more than a millisecond to see the case in a whole different light. The one thing reported to me by lawyers using this information is that when they do it right, they get much more of the Judge’s attention both in time and quality — and they are saying that the percentage of times the Judge allows discovery to proceed is increasing exponentially.

Remember that tactically, this case will be won at the beginning because there probably won’t be any end. Once the pretender lender is forced to produce a complete chain of authorized, valid documents, the jig is up. The same lawyer that told you your theories were annoying and ridiculous will turn around and make an offer that you won’t be able to resist — but you also won’t be able to talk about it. Every settlement is contingent upon absolute confidentiality. So for example let’s just say that you close out a case where the property was purchased for $650,000 and the mortgage was $600,000 at 7%. AND let’s say you get a settlement where you as lawyer get paid $75,000, your client gets $50,000 in damages and the mortgage is reduced to $135,000 at 3% 30 years fixed. You probably would want to brag about it. Your client probably would want to throw a party. None of that. You and your client stay quiet or else the money is due back — and so is the house.

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Everyone, I downloaded every Judge in CA. I isolated the Judges in Fresno County, CA where I live. There are 41 Judges in our county and 27 of them have MERS ON THEIR MORTGAGE according to the County Recorders Website. I determined that the Judge in my case not only has one he has two mortgages with MERS AS BENEFICIARY on two different properties. It is my understanding that since a DEED OF TRUST IS A CONTRACT I HAVE A CONTRACT WITH MERS AND SO DOES THE JUDGE. BASED ON THAT DOESN’T HE HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN DECIDING MY CASE AND SHOULDN’T HE RECUSE HIMSELF ? I HAVEN’T BROUGHT THIS TO HIS ATTENTION YET AND I BET HE HAS NO IDEA ABOUT MERS. Can anyone tell me whether I’m right about this or not.
We have been fighting the BANKSTERS SINCE OCTOBER 2007 PRO SE AND OUR NEXT COURT DATE IS JAN.27, 2011.
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP AND KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT.

HYDROGENE

Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, securities fraud |