Archive for 'Eviction' Category
Oct 15, 2012

CLICK HERE FOR CONSULTATION WITH NEIL “We can account for small to reasonable increases in values,” Mr. McKinnon said. “We cannot account for $20,000 jumps in a month.” Editor’s Comment: An amazing quote from someone who obviously is NOW stressing the fundamental elements of an appraisal, especially where there is a loan involved. During the […]

Oct 15, 2012

INTERESTING NUCLEAR OPTION: “A credit bid submitted by anyone, whether authorized or not, might well be an admission (or at least a question of fact allowing the homeowner to go forward in discovery) that the amount owed was far less than the amount demanded in the Notice of Default and demands for collection. The point […]

Oct 15, 2012

The REMICS are mirror images of the NINJA loans — no income, no assets, no job the borrower did not realize that the false appraisal and other deficiencies in underwriting had shifted the risk of loss to the homeowner and the investors Editor’s Notes: Our economy and the economic structure in other countries is stuck […]

Oct 12, 2012

You can consider this an open letter to Bar Associations across the country who are accrediting Seminars for CLE credits. From what I have seen (by attending by myself), listened to (ordering the CD or DVD), and heard from dozens of lawyers attending other seminars regarding foreclosure defense, there is only one point of view […]

Oct 12, 2012

WHERE ARE THE TRIALS? Editor’s Analysis: There are only two choices here: either the insurer knew that the loans were bad or was misled into thinking the loans were good. Or to be more specific, it knew that the mortgage BONDS were bad or it was misled into thinking the BONDS were as GOOD as […]

Oct 11, 2012

Editor’s Comment: Barry Fagan is pulling out the stops and challenging the CA AG to do her job. I am surprised that those who specialize in administrative law have not used the presumed findings of several Federal and State agencies as to a pattern of conduct that is fraudulent and which requires forgery to proffer […]

Oct 11, 2012

Editor’s Comment: “Reckless?” No, it was intentional. And THAT lies at the heart of the media and government perception of this entire securitization scam. The worse the loan, the more money they made. By insuring it for 100 cents on the dollar they received total payback, plus they probably got the honor of foreclosing on […]

Oct 11, 2012

Editor’s comment: While I agree with the Appellate Court and its findings, reversing the judgment against the borrower for being a vexatious litigant, I strongly disagree with the characterization of the case which probably comes from bad pleading and bad argument in court. That is the danger of going into court without at least getting […]

Oct 10, 2012

CREDITOR HAS BEEN PAID The complexity and shroud of mystery surrounding claims of securitizations, assignments etc can be simplified if you just look at the money. This is why I have forensic auditors who chase this information down. Call living lies customer service 520-405-1688 if you can’t find an adequate analyst of your own who […]

Oct 10, 2012

Editor’s Note: Here is a memo I received on a case with which I am assisting. It clearly shows three different stakeholders showing three different amount in arrears. Lawyers who take note of these things often get the Motion to Lift Stay denied, the motion to dismiss denied and the motion for summary judgment denied. […]