Archive for 'securities fraud' Category
Hat Tip to Dan Edstrom in Northern California, our senior securitization analyst for finding this report. Investors Have Had Enough!! “If Citibank wants to settle with the Justice Department and [Attorney General] Eric Holder, that’s fine. Just please don’t settle with investors’ money. Because that’s whose money it is,” Fiorillo says. “It’s not Citibank’s money. […]
I know it doesn’t make sense. Why would a lender falsify documents in order to make a loan? I had a case in which a major regional bank had their loan representatives falsify loan documents by having the borrower certify that there were houses on his two vacant lots. The bank swore up and down […]
In the search for a magic bullet, many pro se litigants and even attorneys have ended up perplexed by laws and rules regarding an action to Quiet Title (frequently misspelled by pro se litigants as “Quite Title”). The purpose of this article is to add some context to the discussion and some reasons for my […]
For the last few weeks I have been harping on the concepts of holder in due course, holder with rights of enforcement, and holder. They are all different. The challenge in court is to get them treated as different in Court as they are in the statutes. The Banks knew through their attorneys that the […]
Courts and lawyers are continually ignoring the obvious. By zeroing in on the NOTE, they are ignoring the documents that allow the person in possession of the note to be in court. That results in elimination of critical elements of a prima facie case in which the Defendant borrower lacks the superior knowledge and resources […]
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Always consult with a licensed attorney about your specific case. Why Experts Are Needed In foreclosure cases involving securitized loans—or loans subject to claims of securitization—the system is intentionally complex. The terms, methods, and money flows are far beyond the knowledge of […]
“In their quest for a windfall they have given the homeowners a path to justice — one where the notice of default, notice of sale, notice of acceleration notice of right to reinstate and redemption rights are all screwed up (i.e., wrong and invalid). With 80%+ of the losses already paid, the loans could have […]
THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY DIDN’T PAY FOR THE LOAN THIS CORROBORATES THE ALLEGATION THAT THE TRUST WAS UNFUNDED IF THE TRUST WAS UNFUNDED IT COULD NOT HAVE ORIGINATED OR ACQUIRED THE LOAN In situations where the alleged REMIC Trust is the party initiating foreclosure, you will find in most instances that they are alleging that […]
Hat Tip to Beth Findsen who is a good friend and a great lawyer in Scottsdale, Az and who provided this case to me this morning. I always recommend her in Arizona because her writing is spectacular and her courtroom experience invaluable. This case needs to be analyzed further. Robert Hager (CONGRATULATIONS TO HAGER IN […]
Patrick Giunta brought this article to my attention. He practices in South Florida and I co-counsel cases with him. Although there are some errors in facts and I have some differences of opinion with the writer, I think the article is a MUST-READ for anyone effected by “securitization” — especially foreclosure defense attorneys. If nothing […]


