What you need to realize is that this is all about technical law. It is not an argument. It doesn't matter whether the act was ministerial or could be labeled as anything else. The question is simply whether they did it. Don't get lost in the weeds. If they did it, then the company that was designated as the "servicer" did…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

In one case that I eventually won in 2016, I actually Titled a pleading, "At what point do this Court's orders mean anything?" After reviewing approximately 10,000 cases starting in 2006, I have arrived at the conclusion that judges are unintentionally or unwittingly being drafted into an illegal scheme. Take some examples: Suppose John Smith wants to file a lawsuit…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Law students are taught only two forms of securitization: (1) divide an asset to sell to multiple investors or (2) divide ownership of the whole asset into multiple shares between investors. They are never taught anything about the dozens of other forms of securitization, most of which form the foundation of current practices. The main applicable form of securitization as…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Who or what is the real party in interest on Plaintiff's side of the "v." and what citizenship does that party hold. Despite its best efforts, the Court has not had those simple questions answered, questions that must be answered before any further proceedings or decisions are proper.”) citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: but solely as trustee, Dakota Asset Servs. v. Nixon, LLC, not in its individual capacity, RMAC Trust, Rushmore Loan Management Services, Series 2016-CTT, U.S. Bank National Association
Posted in Uncategorized |

From LoanDepot quarterly report, 2022: The Company derives income primarily from gains on the origination and sale of loans to investors, income from loan servicing, and fees charged for settlement services related to the origination and sale of loans. Not one word about revenues or profits arising from the receipt of principal and interest from borrowers. But people who have…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Corruption, discovery, Fabrication of documents, foreclosure defenses, Motions, Servicer |

You think you sent it to XYZ, that it was received and processed by XYZ and XYZ issued that response. This is virtually NEVER true. In May 2022 the CFPB categorized FINTECH companies as servicers precisely because of what I described above. Did anyone take notice? No. "Defendants' deceptive business practices caused many of these Nevada foreclosures to proceed under…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Standing is established when the party pursuing foreclosure can "demonstrate that it had the right to enforce the note and the right to foreclose the mortgage at the time the foreclosure suit was filed." PNC Mortg. v. Romero, 2016-NMCA-064, ¶ 19, 377 P.3d 461 (alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted). Third parties seeking to enforce a promissory note underlying a mortgage establish…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: LSF9, McCRTHY AND HOLTHUS
Posted in foreclosure mill, legal standing |

Hat tip to summer chic Judicial Notice is a rule of evidence in which the court receives a written request to accept a document into evidence as proof of the truth of the matter asserted. In Foreclosures, the truth of the matter asserted is that there is an unpaid loan account, and the named plaintiff or beneficiary has the right…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: judicial notice
Posted in Corruption, discovery, evidence, Fabrication of documents, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, legal standing, Servicer |

This dispute is governed by Article 9 of the Vermont UCC, which covers secured transactions. Article 9 provides that a creditor has a secured interest in collateral when the interest attaches, meaning "when it becomes enforceable against the debtor with respect to the collateral." 9A V.S.A. § 9-203(a). In general, a security interest becomes enforceable against the debtor when "value has…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

we hold Pennsylvania law recognizes the tort of aiding and abetting fraud, and the scienter requirement for this cause of action is actual knowledge of the underlying fraud. Consequently, the decision of the Superior Court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with this opinion. Jurisdiction…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |