PRESS RELEASE—for immediate release July 1, 2021 For inquiries, please contact: admin@apropertyownersnetwork.org 941-237-0558 American Property Owners Network Plans to Help Pandemic Victims Fight Foreclosures You are Invited to APON's Online Q & A 4:30 PM EST, Tuesday, July 6th Click Here for the link and contact information to register (subject to approval) for the public to join the introductory Webinar):…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
you can use your knowledge ... to ask for things that the foreclosure mill will never provide even though they are required to do so under the rules of civil procedure and more importantly under the terms of a court order issued by the judge commanding them to comply with the discovery demands. That is where most homeowners prevail in…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Thursdays LIVE! Click in to the WEST COAST Neil Garfield Show with Charles Marshall and Bill Paatalo Or call in at (347) 850-1260, 3pm Pacific Thursdays Bill Paatalo will join host Charles Marshall to discuss how lenders behind securitized trusts such as US Bank, has no contact with the so-called certificateholders who would presumably possess bona fides to confirm the status particulars of…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
The Effect of Provisions for Waiver and Release in Forbearance and Modification Documents
Jun 30, 2021
It is not the act of forbearance that admits the existing default. It is the agreement or forbearance that creates an apparent waiver and release of all claims or crimes that might relate to challenges to the existence of the underlying obligation, existence of a financial loss (default), and challenges to any claim of Rights to administer, collect or enforce…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Interesting SCOTUS Decision May Prevent Removal of Certain Lawsuits to Federal Court Where They Normally Die
Jun 30, 2021
The full impact of this decision may not be known for years. But the immediate impact is that it gives homeowners a chance to move for remand back down to state court after attempted removal to Federal Court. Unless clarified later, which does not seem likely, this decision could mean that the Supreme Court of the United States says that…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
While I agree that in most cases there was no substantive transaction with homeowners or that the transaction was not correctly identified as to its components, I do not agree that there are no mortgages or notes. * They plainly exist and even if they are not supported by consideration or are otherwise procured by fraud, duress or other illegal means, they still exist.…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Post-judgment or post-sale documents can be far more revealing than anything filed before the foreclosure is allowed or allegedly completed. They often admit lack of legal standing on the part of the original party named in the foreclosure. This phenomenon would not and could never occur if the forms allowed by courts and the government tracked the requirements of existing…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
The recent Compton Case in Hawaii illustrates the nuances that have been weaponized by the investment banks. It further illustrates basic errors in procedure and objections that continue to result in homeowners inadvertently aiding and abetting an illegal foreclosure against them. see USB v Compton 6-21-21 HI SupCt The decision is correct. The failure to contest the existence of…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
American Property Owners’ Network Plans to Stop Most Foreclosures— Public Will Be Invited to APON's Q & A Webinar 4:30 PM EST, Tuesday, July 6th Scroll down for registration information The American Property Owners Network (APON), a new 501C4 organization and others concerned about the undue influence of global banks and the financial sector over our lives, as well…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Since the first time I seriously looked at what securities brokerage firms on Wall Street talking about derivatives and securitization (around 1970), I have always thought that the consumer contract was a disguised securities scheme and that therefore the "sale" of the financial product sold to consumers and homeowners was in fact a security regulated by SEC laws, rules and…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading


