Feb 12, 2021

The nation’s biggest banks are reporting lower and lower volumes of loans from their own balance sheet — just as I predicted 14 years ago.  The latest article is by  Shahien Nasiripour of Bloomberg and reprinted by Washington Post. The dots are not being connected. Why should they loan off their balance sheet when they can make far higher profits using OPM (Other People’s Money).

*

They have successfully transferred all lender risk to investors, who still have not read the fine print, and to homeowners and consumers, who have no real choice in the marketplace. The investors don’t get to own any “loans” and the “borrowers” end up with no lender, no creditor, no investor, and no loan account. Check it out. In doing so they avoid, on its face, all regulation of lending and securities sales.

*
This created a substantial transactional risk to investors and homeowners and epic systemic risk to the entire financial system costing the government trillions of dollars as we saw in 2008-2010. The bailout, purchase programs for “mortgage bonds” (unsecured certificates) failed to cover any losses because the recipients had no losses. The recipients of such programs received disguised revenue while the losers were left with mounting losses that resulted in the loss of homes and loss of pensions. Taxpayers and the government are still bailing out nonexistent losses.
*
I’ve reviewed tens of thousands of cases and I have been lead trial counsel in many cases defending homeowners in foreclosure. I won nearly all cases — even those in which I was only a consultant — based on one premise: if challenged. the claimant’s attorneys could not come up with one shred of evidence to support the existence, ownership, or authority over the alleged underlying obligation. It’s Texas two-step. They make it look like a loan to consumers but they have no lending intent and they don’t ever establish or maintain any loan account receivable on any ledger. But they fake it when it comes to foreclosure or enforcement.
*
When the transaction is commenced it is even possible that no funding at all occurs if the transaction is falsely billed as a “refinance.” The consumer is steered into a broker who in turn is steered to a “lender” that is acting as a sham conduit for the bookrunner manager Underwriter” (actually “issuer) of securities that are sold as AAA promises to pay periodic payments. The Payor on those certificates is the investment bank doing business as a trust that has no legal existence. The promise, when your dead the fine print is in the sole discretion of the investment bank.
*
The reality of the consumer transaction is that the consumer is paid for services rendered, to wit: issuing a note and mortgage along with their consent to use their personal reputation. Then because the consumer believes it is a loan, they issue the note and mortgage with the intent of acquiring a loan agreement. But they are really returning the consideration paid for their services.
*

So with that game why would anyone issue a loan of money from their own balance sheet? Under the current false claims of securitization (the debt is never sold much less divided into shares) all participants get guaranteed fees far in excess of any amount they ever received under conventional loans.

DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE?

Nobody paid me to write this. I am self-funded, supported only by donations. My mission is to stop foreclosures and other collection efforts against homeowners and consumers without proof of loss. If you want to support this effort please click on this link and donate as much as you feel you can afford.

Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to Stop Foreclosure Fraud.

Click

*
Neil F Garfield, MBA, JD, 73, is a Florida licensed trial and appellate attorney since 1977. He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in business and law. He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and financial analyst.
*

FREE REVIEW: Don’t wait, Act NOW!

CLICK HERE FOR REGISTRATION FORM. It is free, with no obligation and we keep all information private. The information you provide is not used for any purpose except for providing services you order or request from us. In  the meanwhile you can order any of the following:
CLICK HERE ORDER ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGY, ANALYSIS AND NARRATIVE. This could be all you need to preserve your objections and defenses to administration, collection or enforcement of your obligation. Suggestions for discovery demands are included.
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER TERA – not necessary if you order PDR PREMIUM.
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER CONSULT (not necessary if you order PDR)
*
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER PRELIMINARY DOCUMENT REVIEW (PDR) (PDR PLUS or BASIC includes 30 minute recorded CONSULT)
*
FORECLOSURE DEFENSE IS NOT SIMPLE. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE OF A FAVORABLE RESULT. THE FORECLOSURE MILLS WILL DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO WEAR YOU DOWN AND UNDERMINE YOUR CONFIDENCE. ALL EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT NO MEANINGFUL SETTLEMENT OCCURS UNTIL THE 11TH HOUR OF LITIGATION.
  • But challenging the “servicers” and other claimants before they seek enforcement can delay action by them for as much as 12 years or more.
  • Yes you DO need a lawyer.
  • If you wish to retain me as a legal consultant please write to me at neilfgarfield@hotmail.com.
Please visit www.lendinglies.com for more information.