Jan 8, 2020
SO BONY mellon is known to be named as “trustee” over what is probably a nonexistent trust with nonexistent beneficiaries since investors do not qualify as beneficiaries of any trust. The authority of BONY Mellon to represent “certificate holders” is never described in any allegations or exhibits. It is only a label.
Dig deeper and you will find actual trust agreements that are kept from court view, and still others like the “Corridor Agreement” which raises more questions than it could possibly answer found at https://www.lawinsider.com/contracts/dSu5MtwMEFKTTYLOTpEZs/cwabs-asset-backed-certificates-trust-2006-11/corridor-contract-administration-agreement/2006-08-08
Some quotes from the Corridor Agreement
EDITOR'S NOTE: CHL is described as having some interest in some interest rate that appears to be a reference to the rate paid to certificate holders who received an unsecured Promise to make payments to owners of certificates issued by Bear Stearns in the name of a trust that either did not exist or barely existed with virtually no assets and certainly no ownership of loans.
EDITOR'S NOTE: You really need to read this carefully. CHL is assigning without any warranty of ownership because it has no ownership. It is using labels to create a seller and other roles without any descriptions of ownership or authority or even a description of what is being sold and how the sale was consummated --- mostly because there was no such sale except for purposes of getting the loans off the books of Bear Stearns and onto nonexistent financial records of the fictitious trust. Notice also the specific wording that there are recipients of payments described as . certain holders of interests in those payments and excess payments. Unlike most contracts drafted by banks everything is left undefined. In most contracts "holders" would be specifically defined either in the agreement or by reference to a separate agreement where the information could be found. Instead they are relying upon labels and confusion so nobody asks questions. And then further down you see that BONY is not liable for anything done in its name. So the question is how does BONY Mellon claim to be trustee and at the same time have separate agreements inuring to the benefit of CHL (now Bank of America) and a securities brokerage firm? Unless BONY Mellon is in fact trustee for Bear Stearns there would be an bvious conflict of interest preventing BONY from being a trustee.


