Jan 20, 2020

It’s appealing in theory but not very productive.

Once upon a time cancellation or reformation of an instrument was at least somewhat possible. today the courts are not open to that approach. But that might be because it has not been presented properly. If you do get an order cancelling an instrument and it is recorded it is fairly easy to get the instrument either expunged or have the order of cancellation literally attached to the mortgage or deed of trust.

====================================

GET FREE HELP: Just click here and submit  the confidential, free, no obligation, private REGISTRATION FORM. The key to victory lies in understanding your own case.
Let us help you plan for trial and draft your foreclosure defense strategy, discovery requests and defense narrative: 954-451-1230. Ask for a Consult or check us out on www.lendinglies.com. Order a PDR BASIC to have us review and comment on your notice of TILA Rescission or similar document.
I provide advice and consultation to many people and lawyers so they can spot the key required elements of a scam — in and out of court. If you have a deal you want skimmed for red flags order the Consult and fill out the REGISTRATION FORM.
PLEASE FILL OUT AND SUBMIT OUR FREE REGISTRATION FORM 
Get a Consult and TERA (Title & Encumbrances Analysis and & Report) 954-451-1230. The TERA replaces and greatly enhances the former COTA (Chain of Title Analysis, including a one page summary of Title History and Gaps).
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER.
========================
*
Cancellation means to cancel the encumbrance completely, but it does not discharge the debt. To achieve this you would need to show that the mortgage or deed of trust should never have been recorded in the first place — and to show that the only thing I know of that could work is lack of consideration. Today as soon as judges hear that you received a loan, the fact that you say you got it from someone else who is NOT making a claim, is enough for them to rule against you.
*
But the less travelled road has a higher likelihood of being considered as being in good faith. If you petition the court to reform the encumbrance because you  have evidence to plead that another identifiable party is the true creditor, AND that the originator was not working for that other party, then you can say that the encumbrance should be reformed to reflect the actual party who paid value for the debt. In the end this might not get you anywhere in terms of a verdict or judgment but if you are fortunate enough to have a judge that allows discovery, the possibilities increase that there will be a declaration of rights.
*
Quiet title can only be achieved against certain parties unless the encumbrance has been cancelled. This is more easily done in bankruptcy court where the claimant must file a proof of claim or the borrower submits one on behalf of the party claiming to be a creditor. In that sense the court simply issues a declaration that certain parties have no right to collect, process or enforce the debt, note or mortgage.