Archive for 'evidence' Category
Translation: WFB was the “custodian” of alleged “mortgage-backed” certificates issued for the benefit of investors who paid billions of dollars for ownership of the certificates. WFB “Loaned” those alleged securities to brokers. The brokers in exchange provided “collateral” the proceeds of which were reinvested by WFB. In short, WFB was laundering the investors money for […]
The banks have not asked for an order vacating a TILA RESCISSION because they know that following standard procedure would block them from challenging TILA RESCISSION. This is PROCEDURE vs SUBSTANCE. That is what this has always been about. As more courts continue to “rule” on TILA RESCISSION, getting it wrong every time, the effort […]
In answer to questions frequently asked of me, the term “dark pool” was not coined by me nor was it discovered by me as an instrumentality of obscuring financial transactions. I have understood the workings of dark pools since my Wall Street days. But back then, in the 1960’s and 1970’s they were not so […]
Last night on the Neil Garfield Show, Charles Marshall brought up the idea of the use of the subpoena power of the court. I agree that this is a way of lawfully penetrating into the inner recesses of the alleged loan process. People ask me to whom should they issue a subpoena? Opinions vary. But […]
As Bill Paatalo (who brought this to my attention) says: “You can’t make this s–t up.” Reality is much stranger than fiction. This marks the point where we have entered the Twilight Zone in law where the rule of law is just a guidepost not to be confused with the real rule of men. Sheila […]
By J. Guggenheim, LendingLies Following the Paper Trail That Doesn’t Exist For nearly a decade, investigator Bill Paatalo has been digging through mountains of bank filings, SEC reports, FDIC data, OCC records, FBI dockets, Attorney General cases, and whistle-blower submissions. His obsession? Finding that elusive sliver of truth that explains how the modern mortgage system […]
One of the first cases I ever handled involved TBW in 2008. As usual they filed a lost note count in their foreclosure complaint. And as is required, they offered to indemnify the homeowner if someone else showed up with the original note. With financial firms dropping left and right, my position was two fold: […]
The key element of the paper strategy has been to create the illusion of transfers of assets, thus supporting the erroneous narrative that with all those parties purchasing the loans, a lot of due diligence MUST have been done and therefore the screaming defense of homeowners (attacking ownership) is nothing but a dilatory stall tactic. […]
Florida Appeals Court Reverses Foreclosure Judgment Over Best Evidence Rule Violation Case: James McCampbell v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second DistrictCase No.: 2D16-177Opinion Filed: February 14, 2018Read the full opinion here » In a significant ruling, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal reversed a foreclosure judgment […]
Fraud for the first time in history has been institutionalized into law. It is foolishness to believe that the banking industry is trustworthy and that they have the right to claim legal presumptions that their fabricated documents, and the forged documents are valid, leaving consumers, borrowers and in particular, homeowners to formulate a defense where […]


