Archive for 'expert witness' Category
Last night on the Neil Garfield Show, Charles Marshall brought up the idea of the use of the subpoena power of the court. I agree that this is a way of lawfully penetrating into the inner recesses of the alleged loan process. People ask me to whom should they issue a subpoena? Opinions vary. But […]
By J. Guggenheim, LendingLies Following the Paper Trail That Doesn’t Exist For nearly a decade, investigator Bill Paatalo has been digging through mountains of bank filings, SEC reports, FDIC data, OCC records, FBI dockets, Attorney General cases, and whistle-blower submissions. His obsession? Finding that elusive sliver of truth that explains how the modern mortgage system […]
One of the first cases I ever handled involved TBW in 2008. As usual they filed a lost note count in their foreclosure complaint. And as is required, they offered to indemnify the homeowner if someone else showed up with the original note. With financial firms dropping left and right, my position was two fold: […]
The key element of the paper strategy has been to create the illusion of transfers of assets, thus supporting the erroneous narrative that with all those parties purchasing the loans, a lot of due diligence MUST have been done and therefore the screaming defense of homeowners (attacking ownership) is nothing but a dilatory stall tactic. […]
Every once in a while it is helpful for the consumer to realize that a non lawyer giving advice or opinions about legal matters is like going to a nail salon for a medical opinion, or worse, treatment. There is a simple test for hiring a purported forensic investigator: Are they in close touch with […]
Practically everyone thinks they know what is a creditor even if they cannot identify who is the creditor. The reason that this is important is that the lawyers for the banks have created a divergence of the money trial and the paper trail. One is worth every cent claimed and the other is worth nothing, […]
When a judge looks carefully at the record, the bank loses. The use of Deutsch’s name in the style of the case still shows that Judges are considering the Plaintiff to be the named “Trustee” instead of the named (or named, which is frequently the case) Trust. In fact the Trustee has nothing to do […]
YOU NEED AN INFINITE NUMBER OF BASES AND PLAYERS TO PLAY BALL WITH THESE GUYS: The Trustee controls the trust as trustee. Oops, wait, it is the Master Servicer who has all the control. No, wait again, it is the subservicer who has the right to administer the loan. But actually if there is an alleged […]
This is a blatant attempt at deception — a deceit without which none of the Trusts would be recognized as legal entities much less the owner of loans. Ocwen is admitting that there is no single owner of the loan it is allegedly “servicing.” “There is no single owner of the account, but rather the […]
Glitch in the fabrication and forgery of documents left counsel for the “trust” without an original allonge. They tried to use a copy. What is surprising is that they appealed. US Bank v Kachik Case 4D16-1776 Get a consult and Chain of Title Analysis! Call 844.583.5339 see also http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=18c9adcb-5683-4074-addd-88fd62c2f95d * In Florida and most states […]
Search Our Blog
Categories
Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339
Connect with us
Contact Our National Headquarters
- 844-583-5339
- Available 24/7
-
200 S. Andrews Ave. Ste. 604
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301