Editor’s Note: It’s hard to imagine that we could have been any more scared than we were a year ago when it looked like we were going over a cliff. And yet we wasted the crisis and continue business as usual despite dire warnings from Simon Johnson (see article below) who has the prospective of being in senior management at the International Monetary Fund for many years, Elizabeth Warren (Chairman of the Congressional Oversight Committee), Ohio Congresswomen Marcy Kaptur and now Florida Congressman Alan Grayson.
Let’s talk turkey — this is like prohibition. Exactly how long does anyone think that virtually the entire middle class of this nation is going to quietly submit to economic slavery — regardless of whose fault it is? How long will someone continue paying on debt whose interest rate is too high to ever retire the debt or whose amount is too high to justify the home it financed? How long will someone sit in a house paying $2100 per month on a $225,000 mortgage when houses around him are being sold by “Specialty firms” (located in South Carolina) for $500 down, $300 per month? Stop kidding yourselves. People are going to simply stop paying and their credit rating be damned. And so many of them will be out there that a new credit paradigm will be required to reflect the new realities.
The “Masters of the Universe” and their congressional proteges along with the Wall Street perspective of the Obama team have it wrong. This is not going to work out the way they have it planned. People voted for change from business as usual not more of it. Debtors, (regardless of what you want to say about “personal responsibility”) are not going to stay enslaved to this system — and nobody can make them do it. Maybe the pretender lenders will continue to get away with this massive theft and squeeze the last ounce of wealth or equity out of the middle class. Maybe they will fail — especially if the investors and the homeowners get together. Whichever scenario plays out the system is going to crumble and society will be permanently tilted unless action is taken to slap down the financial moguls, investment bankers, insurers and others in the financial industry.
I’ve said it before — there isn’t enough money in the world to fix the problem we are in, we are not recovering, the situation is getting worse and if we don’t stop the foreclosures and evictions our entire society will destabilize. The ONLY way out of this is to put back the regulations that worked well enough, (Glass Steagel etc.) and build on those. We have lost control over our government to the financial sector. Like Dick Durbin, Senator from Illinois said, “They own the place.” Simon Johnson says in his blog, www.baselinescenario.com if you look at his slide projection that we are headed for a new loss in GDP of 40%. I think he is being charitable but I will defer to his greater knowledge. Across the globe, everyone knows we must break the back of the bank oligopoly that has taken control over our government. Whether we do that depends upon each and every reader, the decisions they make, the actions they take and remembering what being an American is all about. Marcy Kaptur is precisely correct when she says that President Obama needs to “change generals” in managing the financial crisis. We need to switch from a plan of reassurance to a plan of action.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What happened to the global economy and what we can do about it
Too Politically Connected To Fail In Any Crisis
Over the past 30 years Wall Street captured the thinking of official Washington, persuading policymakers on both sides of the aisle not to regulate (derivatives), to deregulate (Gramm-Leach-Bliley), not enforce existing safety and soundness regulations (VaR), and to stand idly by while millions of consumers were misled into life-ruining financial decisions (Alan Greenspan).
This was pervasive cultural capture or, to be blunter, mind control. But when the crisis broke it was not enough. Having powerful people generally on your side is not what you need when all hell breaks loose in financial markets. Official decisions will be made fast, under great pressure, and by a small group of people standing up in the Oval Office.
If you run a big troubled bank, you need a man on the inside – someone who will take your calls late at night and rely on you for on the ground knowledge. Preferably, this person should have little first-hand experience of the markets (it was hard to deceive JP Morgan and Benjamin Strong when they were deciding whom to save in 1907) and only a limited range of other contacts who could dispute your account of what is really needed.
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Citigroup, we learn today, have such a person: Tim Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury.
We already knew, from the NYT, that most of Geithner’s contacts during 2007 and 2008 were with a limited subset of the financial sector – primarily the big Wall Street players who were close to the New York Fed (including on its board). And the announcement of his appointment was widely regarded as very good news for those specific firms.
But Geithner himself has always insisted that his policies are intended to help the entire financial system and thus the whole economy.
“SECRETARY TIMOTHY GEITHNER: I’ve been in public service all my life. I’ve spent all my life working in government on ways to make our financial system stronger, better economic policy for this country. That’s the only thing I’ve ever done. And I would never do anything and be part of any policy that’s designed to benefit some piece of our financial system. The only thing that we care about and the only obligation I have is try to make sure this financial system is doing a better job of meeting the needs of businesses and families across the country.” Interview on Lehrer NewsHour, May 8, 2009
Geithner’s defenders insist that his specific contacts while President of the NY Fed were a function of that position; “he was only doing his job.”
But today’s AP report, based on looking at Geithner’s phone records, from the inauguration through July, suggest something else. How can anyone build an accurate picture of conditions in the entire crisis-ridden financial sector primarily from talking to a few top bankers?
The list of phone calls is not the largest banks, because some of the biggest are hardly represented (e.g., Wells Fargo), it’s not the most troubled banks (e.g., Bank of America had little contact), and it’s not even investment banker-types who were central to the most stressed markets (Morgan Stanley was not in the inner loop). And small and medium-sized banks (and others) always bristle at the suggestion that their interests are in alignment with those of, say, Goldman Sachs.
Geithner’s phone calls were primarily to and from people he knew well already – who had cultivated a relationship with him over the years, shared nonprofit board memberships, and participated in the same social activities. These are close professional colleagues and in some cases, presumably, friends.
The Obama administration had to rescue large parts of the financial sector, given the situation they inherited. But it absolutely did not have to run the rescue in this exact fashion – bending over backwards to be nice to leading bankers and allowing their banks to become even larger. Saving top executives’ jobs under such circumstances is not best practice, it’s not what the US advises to other countries, it’s not what the US tells the IMF to implement when it helps clean up failed banking systems, and it’s not what the FDIC implements for failed banks under its auspices.
The idea that you could leave big US bank bosses in place (or let them get stronger politically) and do meaningful regulatory reform later has always seemed illusory – and this strategy now appears to be in serious trouble. But presumably Mr. Geithner’s financial advisers told him this was the right thing to do.
By Simon Johnson
Search Our Blog
Categories
Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339
Connect with us
Contact Our National Headquarters
- 844-583-5339
- Available 24/7
-
200 S. Andrews Ave. Ste. 604
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301