What is surprising about this case is that there was any appeal. The trial court had no choice but to dismiss the foreclosure claim. A copy of the note without an indorsement was attached to the complaint. This leads to the presumption that the indorsement was attached after the complaint was filed. Standing must be proven to ex isa at…[...]

Continue Reading

Like the infamous NINJA loans, the REMICs ought to be dubbed NEITs --- nonexistent inactive trusts. The idea of switching lenders without permission of the borrower has been accepted for centuries. But the idea of switching borrowers without permission of the "lender" had never been accepted until the era of false claims of securitization. This is just one example of…[...]

Continue Reading

http://www.mondovisione.com/media-and-resources/news/federal-reserve-board-announces-termination-of-enforcement-actions-against-10-ba/ The Federal Reserve is wrapping up its ineffective sanctions against the five U.S. banks who were accused of improper handling of post-crisis mortgage foreclosures.  On Friday, the Federal Reserve Board announced another $35.1 million in civil penalties against five banks as part of its effort to terminate enforcement actions, issued in 2011 and 2012, against a total of 10…[...]

Continue Reading

Banks have the money and therefore stand closest to the microphone of media. For every report that foreclosures are continuing or rising in number there are 20 reports that the foreclosure crisis is over. This report shows that in New York City foreclosure continue at the same rate as the 2008 recession. The press has failed, intentionally or unintentionally to…[...]

Continue Reading

Adding to the split of authority among California’s various state and federal appellate courts, the Third Appellate District ruled that a loan servicer may owe a duty of care to a borrower through application of the “Biakanja” factors, even though its involvement in the loan does not exceed its servicing duties. Thus, the Third District “assumed without deciding” that California…[...]

Continue Reading

Thursdays LIVE! Click in to the The Neil Garfield Show Or call in at (347) 850-1260, 6pm Eastern Thursdays Neil Garfield will discuss the difference between Information and  Evidence as a preview to the upcoming Evidence seminar to be held February 2, 2018 at 1pm (look for an upcoming announcement). Anyone who is litigating a foreclosure case needs to listen…[...]

Continue Reading

This completely corroborates what I have been saying for years along with a chorus of lawyers and pro se litigants across the county. It simply is not true that the attorney represents the trust or the trustee.  This "Advisory" shows that there are documents that are rarely in the limelight and that clarify claims of securitization in practice. Note that…[...]

Continue Reading

Information is admitted in evidence only after a proper foundation has been laid. If the witness knows nothing about the foundation the evidence should not be admitted as evidence. Appellate courts will usually reverse a trial court's error in ruling on evidence UNLESS the appellate panel decides that the error would not have made any difference in the outcome. The…[...]

Continue Reading

CASE DISMISSED,WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. US BANK DECLINED TO AMEND. CASE DISMISSED. Even where there is a clerk's default “The burden is on the plaintiff to establish its entitlement to recovery.” Bravado Int’l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. Here is an example of how lawyers purport to represent US Bank when in fact they are creating the illusion that…[...]

Continue Reading

  Thursdays LIVE! Click in to the The Neil Garfield Show Or call in at (347) 850-1260, 6pm Eastern Thursdays MAIN NUMBER: 202-838-NEIL (6345). In this episode, Investigator Bill Paatalo questions a declaration that was submitted in a Washington case in which he has been consulting. Scott Aronowitz executes as a "Litigation specialist" for Selene Finance, LP.   However, Paatalo’s research…[...]

Continue Reading