“This isn’t your father’s housing and mortgage market- Mark Hanson, Real Estate Analyst https://www.mhanson.com/ In 2007 the largest housing bubble in American history was inflating and literally popped overnight.  The Mainstream media would prefer that you focus on the DC Circus Show than on the Case-Shiller charts that indicate that 2017 looks eerily familiar. In 2007 unemployment was low,  banks…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: case-shiller, Housing Bubble II, mark hanson
Posted in Uncategorized |

Unfortunately it is not uncommon for courts to skirt the rules in order to protect the banks if they can get away with it.  It is up to California attorneys and homeowners nationwide to contact California’s Fifth District Appellate court and request that the Guliex case be published.  YOU almost didn’t have this opportunity because it appears the court attempted…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: California Fifth Court of Appeals, Guilex, guilex v pennymac
Posted in Uncategorized |

Thursdays LIVE! Click in to the The Neil Garfield Show Or call in at (347) 850-1260, 6pm Eastern Thursdays Please see case here. California Attorney Charles Marshall and Investigator Bill Paatalo will discuss the dangers of judicial presumptions. To prevail in a wrongful foreclosure case, the financial institution  must convince the trial court that: (1) it was, in fact, the…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Finally the courts are coming back to real law as opposed to invented doctrine designed to let the banks win. The significance of this case cannot be overstated. Importantly, this case shows that a pro se litigant (without counsel) can win on appeal after being steamrolled in the trial court. Get a consult and Chain of Title Analysis! 202-838-6345 https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

The moral of the story is don't believe the title record, don't believe the County Clerk, and don't believe anything you think you know about the sale of property subject to a foreclosure judgment. I predicted this 10 years ago. With the entire fraudclosure securitization scheme founded on copies of fabricated and forged documents, it was bound to happen that…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Glitch in the fabrication and forgery of documents left counsel for the "trust" without an original allonge. They tried to use a copy. What is surprising is that they appealed. US Bank v Kachik Case 4D16-1776 Get a consult and Chain of Title Analysis! Call 844.583.5339 see also http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=18c9adcb-5683-4074-addd-88fd62c2f95d  * In Florida and most states following judicial foreclosure rules, the…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: foreclosure defense
Posted in discovery, evidence, expert witness |

http://bpinvestigativeagency.com/why-jpmorgan-chase-did-not-purchase-ownership-of-615b-worth-of-wamu-loans-in-three-simple-steps/ Investigator Bill Paatalo questions the practice of using "Substitution of Trustees".  Paatalo points out that WMAAC and WMMSC have never been dissolved and still exist.  Although the loans did not go through the FDIC, Chase executes assignments from the FDIC in order to substitute trustees.  In this article Paatalo demonstrates that JPMorgan Chase did not purchase ownership of $615…[...]

Continue Reading

Tags: Bill Paatalo
Posted in Uncategorized |

Here again the Truth seems to be the third rail of litigation if it is in any way related to the bogus "REMIC" "Trusts" or their "certificates" or their status in foreclosure litigation. None of it is real. Here again we have a case that bends down to pick up pennies while 100 dollar bills are flying overhead. This court…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

Michael Haverluck The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is being petitioned by several small property owners in Michigan who argue that they were victimized by the state’s abusive foreclosure law that allows the local government to steal their property and make hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit off of them. Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) the…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |

  Introduction Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, in Rigby v. Bank of New York Mellon, Case No. 1D16-0665, appears to be considering receding from the “standing at inception” doctrine in the mortgage foreclosure context. That rule requires foreclosing lenders to prove not only that they have the right to enforce the note and mortgage at the time of trial,…[...]

Continue Reading

Posted in Uncategorized |