For Further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 ================================= see Murray vs. HSBC – 4D13-4316 Having exhausted all possible explanations for the fraudulent behavior of the banks, the 4th DCA has now come to the conclusion that the reason for robo-signing, fabrication, backdating, forgery etc. is that there was no transaction underlying the paperwork that […]

Tags: 4th DCA, assumptions, Florida, Murray v HSBC, nonholder in possession, presumptions, UCC
Posted in Uncategorized |