What is important to recognize is that the presumptions from the bench that the banks would not intentionally commit crimes or violations is wrong. It is important because all legal presumptions are predicated upon the supposition of trustworthiness of the party proffering evidence. This presumption is wrong. The banks have been fabricating accounts, “business records” […]

Tags: credibility, legal presumptions, MBS purchasers, REMIC, trust, TRUSTWORTHINESS
Posted in Uncategorized |

For further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 ———————————————- see AppellateOpinion Holt v Calchas 4th DCA decision The clear assumption in this case is that Wells Fargo had stepped into the shoes of the lender and that if Wells Fargo did not win or if its surrogate did not win, it was assumed that the […]

Tags: assignment, business records exception, Cargill, Chase, consumer solutions 3 LLC, evidence code, Florida, Florida statute 90.803(6)(a), GLARUM V LASALLE, hearsay rule, Holt decision WAMCO decision, HUNTER V AURORA, Payment history hearsay objection, Servicer advances, SPS, TRUSTWORTHINESS, verbal act, WAMCO V INTEGRATED, WEISENBERG V DEUTSCH, Wells Fargo, YISRAEL V STATE
Posted in Uncategorized |