Archive for 'expert witness' Category
For further information and consultations please call 520-405-1688 or 954-495-9867. We offer litigation support to attorneys throughout the country. Consultations outside of Florida require an attorney to be on the line with you. ——— We received so many calls from my post on Friday asking me to write more on the Burden of Proof that […]
As further corroboration of the articles on this site and an infinite number of mainstream and not-so-mainstream sites, the banks sold mortgage bonds to investors under the presumption that the risk of loss was nearly zero. If done properly, securitization works. It gives a greater opportunity to more people to get home loan and other […]
THE PERFECT CRIME: THE VICTIMS DON’T KNOW ANYTHING WHY INVESTORS AND BORROWERS SHOULD GET RID OF THE SERVICERS AND REPLACE THEM WITH SERVICING COMPANIES THEY CAN TRUST TO MITIGATE THE LOSSES CAUSED BY INVESTMENT BANKS HOW? It is simple: since the perpetrators ignored the REMIC trust, didn’t fund them and never intended to actually have […]
Housing Wire, Ben Lane (see link to article below): “Bank committed fraud in order to show ownership.” We are entering the 6th inning of the game started by Wall Street when it created the smoke and mirrors game based upon false claims of successors and securitization. As lawyers actually do the work investigating and researching, […]
In the search for a magic bullet, many pro se litigants and even attorneys have ended up perplexed by laws and rules regarding an action to Quiet Title (frequently misspelled by pro se litigants as “Quite Title”). The purpose of this article is to add some context to the discussion and some reasons for my […]
For the last few weeks I have been harping on the concepts of holder in due course, holder with rights of enforcement, and holder. They are all different. The challenge in court is to get them treated as different in Court as they are in the statutes. The Banks knew through their attorneys that the […]
Courts and lawyers are continually ignoring the obvious. By zeroing in on the NOTE, they are ignoring the documents that allow the person in possession of the note to be in court. That results in elimination of critical elements of a prima facie case in which the Defendant borrower lacks the superior knowledge and resources […]
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Always consult with a licensed attorney about your specific case. Why Experts Are Needed In foreclosure cases involving securitized loans—or loans subject to claims of securitization—the system is intentionally complex. The terms, methods, and money flows are far beyond the knowledge of […]
THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY DIDN’T PAY FOR THE LOAN THIS CORROBORATES THE ALLEGATION THAT THE TRUST WAS UNFUNDED IF THE TRUST WAS UNFUNDED IT COULD NOT HAVE ORIGINATED OR ACQUIRED THE LOAN In situations where the alleged REMIC Trust is the party initiating foreclosure, you will find in most instances that they are alleging that […]
Hat Tip to Beth Findsen who is a good friend and a great lawyer in Scottsdale, Az and who provided this case to me this morning. I always recommend her in Arizona because her writing is spectacular and her courtroom experience invaluable. This case needs to be analyzed further. Robert Hager (CONGRATULATIONS TO HAGER IN […]


