Archive for 'foreclosure mill' Category
COMMENT FROM READER: I received a printed copy from the Deutsche Bank, in reply to a complaint I filed against Deutsche Bank to Federal Reserve Bank New York. Title of the Page is “ROLE OF THE TRUSTEE IN THE US MORTGAGE MARKET” Under the TRUSTEE; It says ” Performs a variety of functions, among them […]
One of the hardest things for people to get their minds around is how borrowers were defrauded. The nagging question keeps coming to mind “But you DID sign the loan and take the money, didn’t you?” Yes you did, but you did it because of a representation and virtual guarantee from several parties at the […]
6.29.10Bank-of-New-York-v-Michael-Raftogainis[1] Judge Todd also stated that additional discovery is to be produced when the foreclosure involves a securitization, lost note claims, or a holder in due course challenge (which may arise in the context of the purported assignment of a toxic loan to a securitized trust prior to the trustee of that trust instituting a […]
“Trust me, I’m your friend.” “Hi! I want to be your Lender” (pretender lender) “I’ve got a great deal for you” “Here is the name of the underwriter of your loan.” “Here is the appraisal — it came in higher than your deal.” “You can rely on the appraisal” “It’s a 30 year loan” (1-6 […]
I like this post from a reader in Colorado. Besides knowing what he is talking about, he raises some good issues. For example the original issue discount. Normally it is the fee for the underwriter. But this is a cover for a fee on steroids. They took money from the investor and then “bought” (without […]
It is hard to state this strongly enough. The entire mortgage backed securitization structure was based upon FRAUD. An intentional misstatement of a material fact known to be untrue and which the receiving party reasonably relies to his detriment is fraud. BOTH ends of this deal required fraud for completion. The investors had to believe […]
Having just received the transcript on this case, I find that what the Judge said could be very persuasive to other Judges. I am renewing the post because there are several quotes you should be using from the transcript. Note the intimidation tactic that Plaintiff’s Counsel tried on the Judge. A word to the wise, […]
The article below was purloined from www.foreclosureblues.wordpress.com — the comments are mine. Neil Garfield “According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Deutsche Bank now holds loans for American single-family and multi-family houses worth about $3.7 billion (€3.1 billion). The bank, however, claims that much of this debt consists of loans to wealthy private customers. (EDITOR’S […]
By Collete McDonald Editor’s Note: Ms. McDonald hits the nail on the head with this article. You should incorporate it word for word in any relevant memoranda. Why is this important? Because most of the “notes” (assuming they were the real notes and were timely indorsed and not back-dated) are presented as having been indorsed […]
The model concluded that roughly one-third of the loans were for amounts that were 105 percent or more of the underlying property’s value. Roughly 5.5 percent of the loans in the pools had appraisals that were lower than they should have been. In one pool with 3,543 loans, for example, the CoreLogic model had enough […]
Search Our Blog
Categories
Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339
Connect with us
Contact Our National Headquarters
- 844-583-5339
- Available 24/7
-
200 S. Andrews Ave. Ste. 604
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301