Finally the courts are coming back to real law as opposed to invented doctrine designed to let the banks win. The significance of this case cannot be overstated. Importantly, this case shows that a pro se litigant (without counsel) can win on appeal after being steamrolled in the trial court. Get a consult and Chain of Title Analysis! 202-838-6345 https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
The moral of the story is don't believe the title record, don't believe the County Clerk, and don't believe anything you think you know about the sale of property subject to a foreclosure judgment. I predicted this 10 years ago. With the entire fraudclosure securitization scheme founded on copies of fabricated and forged documents, it was bound to happen that…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Glitch in the fabrication and forgery of documents left counsel for the "trust" without an original allonge. They tried to use a copy. What is surprising is that they appealed. US Bank v Kachik Case 4D16-1776 Get a consult and Chain of Title Analysis! Call 844.583.5339 see also http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=18c9adcb-5683-4074-addd-88fd62c2f95d * In Florida and most states following judicial foreclosure rules, the…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Investigator Bill Paatalo: Why JPMorgan Chase did not purchase $615 Billion of WaMu Loans
Jul 24, 2017
http://bpinvestigativeagency.com/why-jpmorgan-chase-did-not-purchase-ownership-of-615b-worth-of-wamu-loans-in-three-simple-steps/ Investigator Bill Paatalo questions the practice of using "Substitution of Trustees". Paatalo points out that WMAAC and WMMSC have never been dissolved and still exist. Although the loans did not go through the FDIC, Chase executes assignments from the FDIC in order to substitute trustees. In this article Paatalo demonstrates that JPMorgan Chase did not purchase ownership of $615…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Here again the Truth seems to be the third rail of litigation if it is in any way related to the bogus "REMIC" "Trusts" or their "certificates" or their status in foreclosure litigation. None of it is real. Here again we have a case that bends down to pick up pennies while 100 dollar bills are flying overhead. This court…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Michael Haverluck The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is being petitioned by several small property owners in Michigan who argue that they were victimized by the state’s abusive foreclosure law that allows the local government to steal their property and make hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit off of them. Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) the…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Florida’s First District Court of Appeal Should Abandon the Standing at Inception Rule in Mortgage Foreclosure Cases
Jul 22, 2017
Introduction Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, in Rigby v. Bank of New York Mellon, Case No. 1D16-0665, appears to be considering receding from the “standing at inception” doctrine in the mortgage foreclosure context. That rule requires foreclosing lenders to prove not only that they have the right to enforce the note and mortgage at the time of trial,…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
President Trump and Republicans in Congress have broadcast their every intention to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The president’s budget attempted to defund it and leading Republicans have called for its director to be fired and replaced with a more Wall Street-compliant regulator. But much like the bulk of Trump’s agenda, that assault remains in the aspirational phase, and…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Ocwen to Shell Out $56 Million in Class-Action Settlement July 20th, 2017 | by Alex Spanko Ocwen Financial Corporation (NYSE: OCN) on Thursday announced that has reached a $56 million settlement over a federal class-action lawsuit, the latest in a line of issues for the troubled servicer. The lawsuit stemmed from alleged problems with restatements in Ocwen’s 2013 and 2014…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
ByDavid Dayen; illustrated byLia Kantrowitz Jul 17 2017, 4:27pm The bank became notorious last year for creating fake accounts on behalf of customers. Now it's trying to kill a class-action lawsuit over shady debit card fees. Wells Fargo became a poster child for corporations that abuse their own customers last year when it got fined for ginning up roughly 2…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading


