HOMEOWNER FIGHTS AND WINS WITH ACORN: watch HOMEOWNER FIGHTS AND WINS ON PRODUCE THE NOTE: watch BLACKMAIL: NO LATE PAYMENTS? NO PROBLEM. GET OUT!: watch PRODUCE THE NOTE: WHEN THE BANK LOST OR DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE: watch "EVERYONE SHOULD PUT THE 'LENDER' TO TASK": watch Servicers do everything they can to keep loans in default, make money on foreclosures too: watch FED…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
EDITOR'S NOTE: It might seem unrelated, but the foreclosure crisis is very much related to BOTH the state budget problems and solutions. While Wall Street tinkered with real property in each state, making unrecorded transfers at huge profits, state Treasurers and county revenue departments have sat idly by watching tens of billions of dollars in uncollected income taxes, recording fees,…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Reader Uncovers 1998 Countrywide Loan Purchase Agreement Showing "Loan" was actually Securities transaction
Jun 4, 2009
A FEW THOUGHTS ON THE ATTACHED AND SOME CONCLUSIONS: COUNTRYWIDE - E-LOAN LOAN PURCHASE AGREEMENT THE MANUAL: I have heard about the MANUAL from several sources but never seen it. This reminds me of another banking practice where the national and regional credit and debit card networks refer to the rules and regulations governing electronic payments and ATM transactions only nobody…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Federal Appeal Slams Lawyers and Pretender Lenders with Sanctions for Misrepresentation on Ownership of Loan
Jun 4, 2009
Read it and use it: judge-youngs-decision-on-nosek Challenge everything: As we have repeatedly stated, the entire position of the would-be foreclosers is a bluff and a fraud upon the court, the borrower and the system. Non-judicial process is improper procedure and unavailable for securitized mortgages: These astonishing breaches of ethics, duties and contract law together with manipulation of procedure to the…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Editor's Note: The reason they "lost" the note is that it was a strategic decision to claim they lost it. There is a procedure for re-establishing a lost note and until recently the rules were extremely loose --- because back in the days when those rules were established you had two parties (the borrower and the bank) instead of hundreds…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Editor's Note: The opinionators at NY Times have it right in their description but wrong in their prescription. The reality is that nearly all securitized mortgage loans are worthless and unenforceable. The marketplace seems to know that --- with "mortgage-backed securities" (that are not backed by anything in reality) selling at 3 cents on the dollar. Reality is that some…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Testimony Before Sub Committee lays the story out short and sweet — TAX EVASION, LIABILITY SHELL GAME
Jun 1, 2009
It's happening.... the word is spreading. Read this carefully. It has lots of good quotes for you to use. But the narrative on who owns the loan is wrong --- the investor purchases a bond and a share of the loans. The SPV "Trust" owns nothing. It is a REMIC conduit which means there are no tax events under the…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Mass Court Affirms Notice requirements, Holder in Due Course and raises New Issues on Auction Bids
May 28, 2009
Massachusetts is a power of sale state (non-judicial, but there is plenty of securitized meat in here for everyone). Good stuff to quote from --- with Banks making the arguments that we are promoting on this Blog. The issues include (a) notice (b) unmarketable title and unable to get title title insurance (c) void certificate of title involving improper notice…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
EDITOR'S NOTE ON SAL D'ANNA CONTRIBUTION: Excellent submission Sal. I have a few thoughts in addition to what you have stated in your post. You make a great point about the distinction between void, voidable and invalid. They are three different things. In the context of a securitized mortgage and note, there are additional factors that should be kept in…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
Borrower's RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO TAX ATTORNEYS FEES AND ANSWER
May 21, 2009
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO TAX ATTORNEYS FEES AND ANSWER Defendant, DOUGLAS SCHWARTZ AND TAMMY SCHWARTZ, files its response and additional answer to plaintiffs U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION (SASCO) 2007-BNC1, Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2007-bnc1 motion for summary judgment and to tax attorneys fees. 1. Plaintiff alleged that they had…[...]
Continue Reading
Continue Reading


