I was recently requested to review a 6th Circuit Opinion in which the court stated that the rescission was barred by res judicata — i.e. that the matter had already been litigated and that the homeowner was therefore barred from bringing it up again.  * The Court never considered that it was wrong in the […]

Tags: 15 USC §1635 et seq, 20 days, 6th Circuit, foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, jesinoski, Moral Hazard, operation of law, rescission, subject matter jurisdiction, VOID
Posted in Uncategorized |

We get it. Judges don’t like statutory rescission under TILA. They are not required to like TILA rescission but they are required to follow it. This decision openly defies the SCOTUS ruling and refuses to apply it. Despite clear legislative intent to prevent banks from stonewalling rescission they are succeeding in doing so nonetheless as […]

Tags: 20 days, damages, disclosure, disgorgement, effective, foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, fraud, jesinoski, Mortgage, note, securitization, TILA rescission
Posted in Uncategorized |

For more information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 NOTE: There are strategic nuances here on when to do what. That is included in our rescission package. Some things are better left unsaid in a public forum. This is not an opinion of law upon which you should rely. You should find an attorney who has […]

Tags: 20 days, disgorgement of money under TILA rescision, jesinoski, rescission, return of canceled note, satisfaction of mortgage, TILA, US Supreme Court
Posted in Uncategorized |