Archives by Tag ' Attorney in fact '
Oct 22, 2019

The very idea of two huge Bank competitors naming each other as attorney in fact defies common sense — if they were dealing with anything real. The use of “attorney in fact” is merely a ruse in order to bridge gaps in the facial validity of documents being used in foreclosure. It also is used to create the illusion that the grantor owned […]

Sep 28, 2016

In short, the proffer of a document signed not by the grantor or assignor but by a person with limited authority and no knowledge, on behalf of a company claiming to be attorney in fact is an empty self-serving document that provides escape hatches in the event a court actually looks at the document. It […]

Jan 31, 2011

ONE ON ONE WITH NEIL GARFIELD COMBO ANALYSIS TITLE AND SECURITIZATION BORROWER APPEARED PRO SE GAME OVER: EVIDENCE REQUIRED, NOT PRESUMPTIONS EVEN IF HOLDER, THEY ARE NOT HOLDER IN DUE COURSE; DEFENSES APPLY SEE 01.28.2011 NJ CT OF APPEALS REVERSE NO STANDING -WELLS-FARGO-BANK-N-A-As-Trustee-Respondent-V-SANDRA-a-FORD-Appellant[1] NOTABLE QUOTES: This appeal presents significant issues regarding the evidence required (E.S.) […]