Corroborating what I have been saying for years on this blog, the Supreme Court of the state of California is reasserting its position that if entity ABC wants to collect on a debt in California, then that particular entity must own the debt. This is basic common sense and simply follows article 9 of the […]

Tags: ARTICLE 9, borrower, California Supreme Court, creditor, DEBTOR, Glaski, Investor, ownership of the note, recusal, UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, evidence, expert witness, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, Modification, Motions, Pleading, securities fraud, Servicer |