Archives by Tag ' DEED OF TRUST '
May 13, 2010

One of the interesting things about Arizona Law is that it is perfectly legal to tape record a telephone conversation without the knowledge or consent of the parties to that call. I have a tape recording of a conversation between a borrower up in Scottsdale and an officer of Deutsch bank who is in charge […]

Apr 29, 2010

Editors’ Note: In response to my post on ID THEFT I received a number of comments and ideas. Here is one example of how someone stuck to the message and forced the issue using ID theft as a defensive tactic as well as preparing for an offensive response. Are you reading my mind? Out of […]

Apr 28, 2010

There is a lot of conflicting opinions about this. My opinion is that the confusion arises not from the law, not from application of the law and not from what is written on the note or deed of Trust. If you look at the Bellistri Missouri case the issue is well settled. And the problem […]

Apr 25, 2010

The statute says that the trustee mails the notice to all affected parties at least three months before the sale date. In a non-judicial sale, then, ALL parties having a potential stake in the outcome must be notified. This is the only way the statute can be constitutional. It’s not up to the Trustee to […]

Apr 24, 2010

33-801. Definitions In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. “Beneficiary” means the person named or otherwise designated in a trust deed as the person for whose benefit a trust deed is given, or the person’s successor in interest. [Note that this does not include a nominee like MERS. There is a reason for […]

Apr 20, 2010

From Max Gardner – QUIET TITLE GRANTED Bellistri v Ocwen Loan Servicing, Mo App.20100309 Mortgage Declared Unenforceable in DOT Case: NOTE DECLARED UNSECURED “When MERS assigned the note to Ocwen, the note became unsecured and the deed of trust became worthless” Editor’s Note: We know that MERS is named as nominee as beneficiary. We know […]

Apr 9, 2010

The bad news is that the Court mistakenly assumes that MERS must be the party to enforce because the MERS assignment was backdated. MERS specifically and publicly disclaims any interest in the mortgage, note or obligation. How can MERS assign something it disclaims? MERS internet site and promotional literature all say the same thing — […]

Mar 26, 2010

USE THIS AS A GUIDE FOR DISCOVERY, FORENSIC ANALYSIS AND MOTION PRACTICE TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE see for this example SHARPS%20CDO%20II_16.08.07_9347 Comments in Red: THIS IS A PARTIAL ANNOTATION OF THE PROSPECTUS. IF YOU WANT A FULL ANNOTATION OF THIS PROSPECTUS OR ANY OTHER YOU NEED AN EXPERT IN SECURITIZATION TO DO IT. THERE ARE THREE […]