It is universally accepted that a mortgage or deed of trust may not enforced except by the owner of the actual debt. The debt exists regardless of whether it is in writing or not. While a promissory note might be enforced by a party who does not own the debt (Article 3 UCC), forfeiture of a homestead requires that […]

Tags: enforceable, facially invalid, facially valid, prima facie case
Posted in discovery, evidence, Fabrication of documents, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, legal standing, Pleading |

SEE LIVINGLIES LITIGATION SUPPORT AT LUMINAQ.COM conformedcomplaint “They focused on short-term gains to increase their own compensation, with reckless disregard for WaMu’s long-term safety and soundness,” the agency said in the 63-page complaint. “The F.D.I.C. brings this complaint to hold these highly paid senior executives, who were chiefly responsible for WaMu’s higher-risk home lending program, […]

Tags: administrative action, BURDEN OF PROOF, Chase, David C. Schneider, disclosure, F.D.I.C., foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, fraud, Kerry K. Killinger, predatory lending, prima facie case, rescission, securitization, Stephen J. Rotella, WAMU, Washington Mutual
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, securities fraud |

NON-JUDICIAL STATES: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FORECLOSURE AND SALE: FORECLOSURE is a judicial process herein the “lender” files a lawsuit seeking to (a) enforce the note and get a judgment in the amount owed to them (b) asking the court to order the sale of the property to satisfy the Judgment. If the sale price is […]

Tags: allegations, ARIZONA, authentication, burden proof, competent witness, due process, election of non-judicial sale, exhibits, FOUNDATION, judicial, judicial economy, lawsuit, NON-JUDICIAL SALE, objection to sale, prima facie case, PROOF
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure mill, Modification, securities fraud, Servicer |

SECURITIZATION If They Did It Right Sometimes it IS easier to prove a negative than a positive. Your opposition has far more facts than you do and in due process, should be required to prove them up into a prima facie case using real evidence from competent witnesses, with real documents that nobody played with […]

Tags: business records, CLOSING WITH BORROWER, CLOSING WITH INVESTORS, CLOSING WITH SECURITIZATION PARTICIPANTS, evidence, prima facie case, securitization, SUBROGATION, SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, third party payments
Posted in foreclosure mill, Modification, securities fraud |

In Court, a prima facie case is, in plain English, the completion of a party’s burden of proof. That means if you are seeking AFFIRMATIVE relief from the Court, then you have the burden of proving your case. In order to prove your case you must present evidence. Your evidence must conform to the legal […]

Tags: adversary judicial proceeding, AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF, BREACH, BURDEN OF PROOF, damage, duty, evidence, judicial, negative relief, non-judicial, orientation of parties, prima facie case
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, expert witness, securities fraud, Servicer |

Investment banks bundled mortgage loans into securities and then often rebundled those securities one or two more times. Those securities were given high ratings and sold to investors, who have since lost billions of dollars on them. Editor’s Note: The significance of this report cannot be overstated. Not only did the investment bankers LOOK for […]

Tags: accounting, Bank of America, BofA, bundled, BURDEN OF PROOF, Charles Koppa, Citigroup Inc, Countrywide Home Loans, damages, Deutsche Bank AG, Fitch ratings, Goldman Sachs, GRETCHEN MORGENSON, guaranteed to fail, injunction, JP Morgan Chase, Louise Story, Merrill Lynch, modifications, Moody's Investor Service, prima facie case, rebundled, securitization, short sales, Standard & Poor's, Substitute Trustee, The New York Times, yield spread premium
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure mill, Modification, securities fraud, Servicer |

Practically all the questions I get relate to how to prove the case that the loan was securitized. This is the wrong question. While it is good to have as much information about the pool a loan MIGHT BE INCLUDED, that doesn’t really answer the real question. The real question is what is the identity […]

Tags: AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF, amortization, assignment, assumption, authenticity of the assignment, BURDEN OF PROOF, credit default swaps, credit enhancement, cutoff date, DEED OF TRUST, discovery, full accounting of all payments, identity of the creditor, insurance, judicial economy, judicial proceeding, Mortgage, Motion Practice, non-judicial statutes, note, Obligation, offer AND an acceptance, owed on my obligation, payments from third parties, pooling and service agreement, prima facie case, pro se litigants, securitization, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure mill, Modification, securities fraud, Servicer |