The secured party, the identified creditor, the payee on the note, the mortgagee on the mortgage, the beneficiary under the deed of trust should have been the investor(s) — not the originator, not the aggregator, not the servicer, not any REMIC Trust, not any Trustee of a REMIC Trust, and not any Trustee substituted by […]

Tags: borrower, creditor, disclosure, escrow agent, foreclosure, foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, LOAN MODIFICATION, predatory lending, securitization, TILA audit
Posted in Corruption, evidence, expert witness, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, Modification, Pleading, securities fraud, Servicer |

The possibility of a lawsuit against the escrow agent in the closing of the mortgage loan that was subject to securitization or claims of securitization raises several essential issues. In most cases the escrow agent is also the title agent. The title agent has it issued a title commitment and a title policy presumably based […]

Tags: closing of escrow, escrow agent, title agent, title insurer
Posted in Corruption, evidence, expert witness, foreclosure mill, Modification, Motions, Pleading, securities fraud, Servicer |

Getting the closing instructions and the closing documents, including the wire transfer receipts and wire transfer instructions, one is able to piece tog ether that escrow was never properly closed. This could mean that escrow is still open — leaving open the option of a three day rescission. Dan points out in response to me […]

Tags: Bogan v. Wiley (1949), closing of escrow, conditions precedent to closing escrow, delivery of note, escrow agent, failure of delivery of an instrument, Jeannerette v. Taylor (1934), POSSESSION VERSUS AUTHORITY OR RIGHT TO ENFORCE THE INSTRUMENT], Sousa v. First California Co. (1950), Todd v. Vestermark (1956)
Posted in Corruption, foreclosure mill, Modification, Motions, Pleading, securities fraud, Servicer |