If the banks lose the application of the UCC, which they should, they are dead in the water because they have no way to prove the transactions upon which they rely in collection and foreclosure. Internet Store Notice: As requested by customer service, this is to explain the use of the COMBO, Consultation and Expert […]

Tags: clause 22, Danielle Kelley, et al., et seq., Fl Statutes §673.1041(1)(c), Fla. Stat. §673, GMAC v. Honest Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc., N.A. v. Christopher J. Chesney, Non-negotiability of Mortgage and Note, paragraph 22, Sims v. New Falls Corporation, UCC, Wells Fargo Bank
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, evidence, securities fraud, Servicer |