Archives by Tag ' foreclosure defense '
FROM THE COMMENT SECTION THANK YOU ANDREW): I THINK HE’S GOT IT! There is no getting away from the fact that the lender is the investor and that anyone else whose name was inserted in the documentation did so not only without authority but as an intentional misrepresentation as part of a fraudulent scheme to […]
If the lawyer is not a competent witness with personal knowledge, then he should shut up and sit down. See also fraud-on-the-court-reversing-the-tide See also Judge Young: federal-appeal-slams-lawyers-and-pretender-lenders-with-sanctions-for-misrepresentation-on-ownership-of-loan See also modification-fraud-the-latest-game-in-town So you sent a QWR and you know the loan is securitized. The orignating lender says talk to the servicer and the servicer declines […]
Thank you Deontos Comment: I always thought TWO for the price of ONE was a GOOD thing. Everybody’s talking about the Kansas Appellate Decision? What about this one from Arkansas’s Supreme Court? Same issues, MERS and “black letter law” …. MERS **Lost** and the Arkansas Supreme Court cited the Landmark v KESLER Kansas Decision. ————————————————————— […]
If I am right, then why are judges are not buying this? see msnbc discussion of “What’s in the Bag?”> object> The problem here is becoming increasingly apparent with Judges of many different ideological persuasions. This all looks like a gimmick to them. And they are right. It’s just that the one finessing the gimmick […]
Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act Public Law FIL-56-2009 September 28, 2009 Summary: On May 20, 2009, President Obama signed the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009, Public Law 111-22. Included in the public law is the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act (Division A, Title VII), which provides protections for tenants, including tenants in […]
In order to revive securitization, taxpayers would have to absorb large risk. The social gains would be small, or perhaps even nonexistent. The best thing to do with the shattered Humpty-Dumpty of mortgage securitization would be to toss the broken pieces into the garbage. See Also Securitized Mortgages Are Illegal: Securitization Is ILLEGAL Should Mortgages […]
See entire decision here > kansas-supreme-court-sets-precedent-key-decision-confirming-livinglies-strategies See also Arkansas Supreme Court stating the same principles and citing to Kansas: arkansas-supreme-court-denies-mers-legal-standing Annotations: See this list of cases cited by pretender lenders: Lender’s Cases mers-getting-the-grilling-it-deserves kansas-s-ct-decision-annotation-2-reversing-default kansas-waking-up-to-discover-the-mortgage-market-was-a-giant-criminal-enterprise What does this decision mean? It means that there are several direct strategic moves that are suggested both by the […]
“If courts are willing to say MERS doesn’t have any ownership interest in mortgage loans, that may eventually call into question the priority of liens recorded in MERS’s name, and there are millions and millions of them.” September 27, 2009 Fair Game The Mortgage Machine Backfires By GRETCHEN MORGENSON WITH the mortgage bust approaching Year […]
Thanks to Nye Lavalle for this Submission Editor’s Note: Tacit Procuration Available in Most States. Watch those procedural requirements on reversing foreclosure. The main procedural points are first file to reverse the sale alleging fraud etc. Second, have a court reporter present at any hearing if you need to appeal. In addition whether it is […]
The movement is growing and approaching critical mass. It won’t be long now before everyone — including politicians are singing a different song. The fact is most of these foreclosures are wrong — legally, morally, ethically, politically and economically. Kudos to this fine lawyer who is showing some gumption and outrage — something lacking in […]


