Archives by Tag ' foreclosure defense '
The State of New York, along with many other states are struggling with problems arising from an array of legal fictions created by the courts to justify claims for administration, collection, and enforcement of virtual debts (instead of actual debts in the real world). These attempts violate the constitutional separation of powers under the Federal […]
A Sarasota Judgment That Shook the Foreclosure Machine A 2020 Sarasota, Florida judgment shows the deep gap between foreclosure fantasy and reality. The case: U.S. Bank, as Trustee for the LSF11 Master Participation Trust v. Cheri Melchione, Case No. 2011 CA 5724 NC (12th Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Florida). The plaintiff—LSF11 Master Participation Trust—was no […]
Western Progressive LLC is named as Trustee or even Attorney on many forms, notices and recorded documents in foreclosures. So who is this Luxembourg LLC and why do all paths lead back to Ocwen? Why such a company would ever be seen as a qualified party to (a) serve as a trustee on a deed […]
What Many Homeowners Don’t Know About Stopping Foreclosure After It Begins When foreclosure starts, many homeowners assume it’s already too late to stop foreclosure. That belief is often wrong. This case shows how a homeowner took the time to understand her mortgage, the foreclosure timeline, and the sale date process before giving up. By doing […]
People keep getting letters and they tend to treat the information as real simply because it is in writing. That is the nub of the Wall Street scheme — send out written communication and documents without regard to the truth and people will assume that the document or letter would not have been sent if […]
PSA ≠ Trust Agreement: The “Bare Naked Title” Trap Driving Modern Foreclosures TL;DR: A Pooling & Servicing Agreement (PSA) is not a trust agreement. In many MBS foreclosures, only bare legal title is shifted—without any transfer of the underlying debt. Under UCC 9-203 (adopted verbatim in all U.S. jurisdictions), no one can enforce a mortgage […]
The big problem in legal practice is acceptance of the idea that the servicer is the servicer. The practice guide is simple: test that proposition before you do anything else. This is the same strategy as what the litigator should do with the REMIC Trust, the REMIC Trustee and others. None of them are […]
It’s no magic bullet but it can be used effectively. Why the “Holder in Due Course” Argument Matters If you are facing foreclosure, you might hear about something called a holder in due course (HDC). This term basically means a person or company that legally owns the loan and has rights to collect on it. […]
see https://www.natlawreview.com/article/district-court-requires-plaintiff-to-disclose-evidence-about-noneconomic-loss I have been writing, lecturing, and just saying the same thing since 2006. Homeowners don’t need to prove anything. The objective in Foreclosure Defense is to prevent the claimant from pursuing their claim. If you are not willing to do all the necessary work and to make certain you have it right, then […]
The failures to disclose material facts providing the real context of the “loans” deprived borrowers of choice between lenders and deprived them of the opportunity of bargaining for terms that were based upon the economic reality — that the main point of the loan origination was not the loan but rather the sale of unregistered […]


