There are many well intentioned people and lawyers who go into court to contest foreclosure cases with the expectation that the foreclosure mill must prove ownership and status of the loan. In plain language they don’t need to prove that because of a legal fiction called a “legal presumption.” That is a shorthand way of […]

Tags: foreclosure burden of proof, legal presumptions, motion for sanctions, Motion IN Limine, motion to compel discovery
Posted in discovery, Fabrication of documents, foreclosure defenses, Pleading |

see https://www.natlawreview.com/article/district-court-requires-plaintiff-to-disclose-evidence-about-noneconomic-loss I have been writing, lecturing, and just saying the same thing since 2006. Homeowners don’t need to prove anything. The objective in Foreclosure Defense is to prevent the claimant from pursuing their claim. If you are not willing to do all the necessary   work and to make certain you have it right, then […]

Tags: discovery, foreclosure defense, motion for contempt, motion for sanctions, motion for summary judgment, Motion IN Limine, Motion Practice, motion to compel discovery
Posted in discovery, evidence, foreclosure defenses, legal standing, Motions, Pleading |

Based on questions that greeted me when I got to my desk this morning, here are just some of the thoughts that apply — a case review and analysis for each case being necessary to actually draft the right questions and to close any trap doors. Let us help you plan for trial and draft […]

Tags: authority, authority to represent, beneficiaries, discovery, Hawaii, motion for summary judgment, Motion Practice, motion to compel discovery, MOTION TO DISMISS, owner of the debt, REMIC TRUST, settlor, Supreme Court, trustee, Trustor
Posted in Uncategorized |