Nearly everyone is confused as to the identity of the real holder in due course, or the “creditor,” or the owner of the debt. Nearly everyone thinks that ultimate it is investors who purchased certificates. In fact there is no holder in due course and there never will be in most instances. There was never […]

Tags: discovery, holder in due course, investment bank, owner of the debt, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, table funded loan, TILA
Posted in Corruption, discovery, evidence, Fabrication of documents, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, legal standing, Modification, Pleading, Servicer |

No trust and no investor ever received the money. Chase got it and lest you forget, remember that Chase was all about selling loans and derivatives based upon loans and synthetic derivatives based upon the derivatives. It was never about actually making loans where Chase could lose money or buying loan as that were going to be worthless of worth less. It was about selling them. So the revelation is that BONY never had a claim to the money and either did the nonexistent trust that was ignored once the foreclosure court proceedings were over.

Tags: BONY, Chase, follow the money trail, Mellon, owner of the debt, right to foreclose, servicer
Posted in Uncategorized |

I’m sharing the wording I use in my TERA and Case Analysis reports now. I think the benefit of this wording is that it fills in the blank on who is the real creditor (owner of the debt). Hopefully it answers the following informal question lurking in the context of mortgage litigation: “If the parties […]

Tags: assignment, BURDEN OF PROOF, indorsement, OBJECTIONS, owner of the debt, presumptions, third party strangers, TPS, transfer
Posted in Uncategorized |

Based on questions that greeted me when I got to my desk this morning, here are just some of the thoughts that apply — a case review and analysis for each case being necessary to actually draft the right questions and to close any trap doors. Let us help you plan for trial and draft […]

Tags: authority, authority to represent, beneficiaries, discovery, Hawaii, motion for summary judgment, Motion Practice, motion to compel discovery, MOTION TO DISMISS, owner of the debt, REMIC TRUST, settlor, Supreme Court, trustee, Trustor
Posted in Uncategorized |

Homeowners seem to have more options than they think in an unlawful detainer action based upon my analysis. It is the first time in a nonjudicial foreclosure where the foreclosing party is actually making assertions and representations against which the homeowner may defend. The deciding factor is what to do at trial. And the answer, […]

Tags: beneficiary, credit bid, duly perfected title, Eviction, foreclosure sale, owner of the debt, Substitution of Trustee, the debt, TRIAL OBJECTIONS, trustee, TRUTH, Unlawful Detainer
Posted in Eviction |