Based on questions that greeted me when I got to my desk this morning, here are just some of the thoughts that apply — a case review and analysis for each case being necessary to actually draft the right questions and to close any trap doors. Let us help you plan for trial and draft […]

Tags: authority, authority to represent, beneficiaries, discovery, Hawaii, motion for summary judgment, Motion Practice, motion to compel discovery, MOTION TO DISMISS, owner of the debt, REMIC TRUST, settlor, Supreme Court, trustee, Trustor
Posted in Uncategorized |

If you want to show examples of what you are alleging and can prove at trial (after discovery) the recent rules and decisions of the federal courts may help, if you are careful. Submission of illustrative materials is most probably advisable in federal practice. It might be allowed in state courts as well. The submission […]

Tags: 12(b)(6), 12(c), 7th Circuit, Federal rules, illustrative materials, Marion Healthcare, motion for judgment on the pleadings, motion for sumamry judgment, MOTION TO DISMISS, pleading requirements, Supreme Court
Posted in Uncategorized |

The “free house” mythology will have become reality. That is what happens when you break the laws governing deceptive and predatory lending. … for those who don’t give up, the reward is substantial when TILA rescission is reluctantly recognized by the Courts as effective upon mailing. Get a consult! 202-838-6345 CALL NOW FOR TONIGHT’S SMALL […]

Tags: 15 USC §1635, 3 YEAR LIMITATION, deceptive lending, EFFECTIVE UPON MAILING, JESINOSKI V COUNTRYWIDE, LOWER COURTS, predatory lending, PURCHASE MONEY LIMITATION, rescission, Supreme Court, TILA rescission, Truth in Lending Act
Posted in Uncategorized |

WE HAVE REVAMPED OUR SERVICE OFFERINGS TO MEET THE REQUESTS OF LAWYERS AND HOMEOWNERS. This is not an offer for legal representation. In order to make it easier to serve you and get better results please take a moment to fill out our FREE registration form https://fs20.formsite.com/ngarfield/form271773666/index.html?1453992450583  Our services consist mainly of the following: 30 […]

Tags: disclosure, foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, jesinoski, JURISDICITION, Pleading, PROOF, Regulation Z, securitization, Supreme Court, TILA rescission
Posted in Uncategorized |

Livinglies Team Services: see GTC HONORS Services, Books and Products =========================== For more information please email us at gtchonors.llblog@gmail.com or call us at 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 This is not legal advice on your case. Consult a lawyer who is licensed in the jurisdiction in which the transaction and /or property is located. =========================== SEE 2015-08-10-0001 […]

Tags: jesinoski, Minnesota, rescission, Supreme Court
Posted in Uncategorized |

For further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 ============================= TENDER IS NOT REQUIRED FOR RESCISSION TO BE EFFECTIVE SCOTUS DECISION CONVERTS RESCINDED SECURED DEBT TO UNSECURED EFFECT ON OLD BANKRUPTCY CASES UNKNOWN see TILA Rescission The decision is merely a statement of the obvious. Scalia, writing for a UNANIMOUS court said that the statute means […]

Tags: Mortgage, notice of rescission, quiet title, rescission, Scalia, statute of limitations, Supreme Court, tender, TILA, wild deed
Posted in Uncategorized |

bony-v-romero_nm-sup.ct.-reverses-with-instruction_2-14 There are a lot of things that could be analyzed in this case that was very recently decided (February 13, 2014). The main take away is that the New Mexico Supreme Court is demonstrating that the judicial system is turning a corner in approaching the credibility of the intermediaries who are pretending to be […]

Tags: ABUSIVE LOAN PRACTICES, assignments, bank of new york, business records exception, competency of witness, DANIEL YOHALEM, endorsements, FEDERAL PREEMMPTION --- OCC STATEMENT, FREDERICK ROWE, hearsay, HLPA, holder of note, JOSEPH ROMERO, JOSHUA SIMMS, JUDICIAL SELF GOVERNANCE, JURISDICITION, KATHERINE ELIZABETH MURRAY, liar loans, MARY ROMERO, MERS, New Mexico, NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY, personal knowledge, POPULAR FINANCIAL SERVICES MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE SERIES #2006, RIGHT TO ENFORCE MORTGAGE, RIGHT TO ENFORCE NOTE, standing, Supreme Court, UCC AND FORECLOSURES
Posted in Corruption, Eviction, evidence, expert witness, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, Modification, Pleading, securities fraud, Servicer |

CHECK OUT OUR EXTENDED DECEMBER SPECIAL! What’s the Next Step? Consult with Neil Garfield For assistance with presenting a case for wrongful foreclosure, please call 520-405-1688, customer service, who will put you in touch with an attorney in the states of Florida, Tennessee, Georgia, California, Ohio, and Nevada. (NOTE: Chapter 11 may be easier than […]

Tags: civil procedure, foreclosures, Illinois, money exchanging hands, PROOF OF CLAIM, proof of loan receivable account, proof of loss, Supreme Court
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, securities fraud |

“The Pendergrass limitation finds no support in the language of the statute codifying the parol evidence rule and the exception for evidence of fraud. It is difficult to apply. It conflicts with the doctrine of the Restatements, most treatises, and the majority of our sister-state jurisdictions. Furthermore, while intended to prevent fraud, the rule established […]

Tags: CALIFORNIA, dual tracking, parole evidence, Pendergrass, Riverside Cold v Fresno-Madera, Supreme Court
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, securities fraud |

Editor’s Comment: It is no small wonder that the banks are scared. After all they created MERS and they control MERS and many of them own MERS. The Washington Supreme Court ruling leaves little doubt that MERS is a sham, leaving even less doubt that an industry is sprouting up for wrongful foreclosure in which […]

Tags: AIG, AMbac, bailout, banks, congress, credit default swaps, insurance, Master Servicer, MEGABANKS, MERS, Supreme Court, TOXIC WASTE, voting, WASHINGTON, wrongful foreclosure
Posted in bubble, Corruption, Eviction, securities fraud |