Archives by Tag ' Regulation Z '
When TILA rescission has occurred the encumbrance is eliminated and the debt converts from one arising from a promissory note to one arising from a statute — 15 USC §1635. The debt then becomes subject to the statute of limitations for claims under TILA because the debt now arises under TILA. If the statute has […]
WE HAVE REVAMPED OUR SERVICE OFFERINGS TO MEET THE REQUESTS OF LAWYERS AND HOMEOWNERS. This is not an offer for legal representation. In order to make it easier to serve you and get better results please take a moment to fill out our FREE registration form https://fs20.formsite.com/ngarfield/form271773666/index.html?1453992450583 Our services consist mainly of the following: 30 […]
If you read my blog for the last 3 weeks or so you should get a good idea of where I am coming from on this. If you still have questions or need assistance call me at 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688. The basic thrust of my argument is that BOTH Congress and US Supreme Court agree […]
For further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 ================================== see At this point it is clear that the banks actually targeted people of color and other demographics where the likelihood of “default” on a loan was extraordinarily high. The ACLU in its latest report on the mortgage crisis proves this to any remaining doubters. This […]
Further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688 No radio show tonight because of birthday celebration — I’m 68 and still doing this ============================== The enforcement of promissory notes lies within the context of the marketplace for currency and currency equivalents. The enforcement of mortgages on real property lies within the the context of the marketplace […]
For representation in South Florida, where I am both licensed and familiar with the courts and Judges, call 520-405-1688. If you live in another state we provide direct support to attorneys. call the same number. Having watched botched cases work their way to losing conclusions and knowing there is a better way, I have been […]
COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION SEARCH, REPORT, ANALYSIS ON LUMINAQ 3.16.2011 Illinois Recission Stewart-v-BAC-w EDITOR’S NOTE: THIS CASE STANDS FOR THE PROPOSITION THAT YOU CAN’T TELL THE BORROWER LATER WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCLOSED AT CLOSING: Federal Law has governed these fake securitized loan transactions from their beginning. That is why they are fatally defective and […]
REGISTER NOW FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE WORKSHOP (2006) Here is a case that should not have been filed (entire text of opinion below) and was argued improperly. The homeowners clearly lost because they put their eggs in the wrong basket. Nonetheless, the opinion is a pretty good compilation of the various statutes, rules and […]


