All contrary arguments are erroneous since they would insert a contingency where the statute contains no room for any contingency. The language of the statute bars any such contingency when it says that the TILA Rescission is effective upon delivery, by operation of law. If anyone wants the statute to say or mean anything different […]

Tags: 3 YEAR LIMITATION, bankruptcy, consummation, Eviction, jesinoski, LOAN MODIFICATION, notice of rescission, TILA rescission, Unlawful Detainer
Posted in legal standing, Modification, Motions, Pleading |

The “free house” mythology will have become reality. That is what happens when you break the laws governing deceptive and predatory lending. … for those who don’t give up, the reward is substantial when TILA rescission is reluctantly recognized by the Courts as effective upon mailing. Get a consult! 202-838-6345 CALL NOW FOR TONIGHT’S SMALL […]

Tags: 15 USC §1635, 3 YEAR LIMITATION, deceptive lending, EFFECTIVE UPON MAILING, JESINOSKI V COUNTRYWIDE, LOWER COURTS, predatory lending, PURCHASE MONEY LIMITATION, rescission, Supreme Court, TILA rescission, Truth in Lending Act
Posted in Uncategorized |