Archives by Tag ' Lender Liability '
It is difficult to imagine anything more obvious than splitting the risk taking core model of Wall Street from the risk averse core model of banking. The dilution of Glass-Steagel over the years and its eventual repeal is exactly how we got into this mess. Coupling that with deregulation and non-transparency created a context in […]
Thanks to Deontos: Editor’s Note: The logic is simple, basic and the law is old, accepted and “black letter.” No new law is needed to overturn all the foreclosures since 2001, no fancy footwork is required to throw the bums out of court and sue them for the damage they created when they filed false […]
Editor’s Note: From Home, to Car to Shelter. It’s a common story and a tragedy. But if that is a tragedy then where is the outrage when we add the component that she was probably wrongly dispossessed, that she probably still owns her house and that if she had proper legal representation in a court […]
Editor’s Note: Anyone who underestimates the importance of Judge Long’s decision in Massachusetts and the combined effect with the Kansas and Arkansas Supreme Court decisions does so at their peril. Lawyers wake up! You are not just missing an opportunity, you are missing an important piece of due diligence that makes you vulnerable to claims […]
JC question shows the way to recovery of equity and helping two or more homeowners for the price of one. Seek damages under any of the theories we have suggested here or any one we have a not thought of and if you get a final judgment for damages it will either be paid by […]
First, you must realize that they are not “Law” with a capital “L”. Other jurisdictions could return opinions that are completely the opposite of the ones we have seen recently. I consider that unlikely. The reasoning is exactly what I have been saying for 2 years when I predicted the title issues, the enforcement issues, […]
Who is the lender? This is an abstract from the Judge Long decision. Things in red were done by Max Gardner, in bold by Neil. see entire abstract Judge Long Ibanez Massachuseetts Decision Abstract Editor’s Note: The “principal” is the “lender” is the creditor” is the “real party in interest” is the “only party that […]
Many Thanks to Max Gardner for this contribution: See entire Case at US Bank v Ibanez Memo of Decision Denying US Bank Mts Oct 14 2009Misc 384283 and Misc 386755 See Neil’s Abstract: judge-long-principal-must-be-disclosed See Boston Globe Article: judge-long-massachusetts-foreclosure-decision-throws-securitization-intermediaries-into-chaos-reo-sales-stopped See what-do-these-case-decisions-mean US Bank v Ibanez. Memo of Decision Denying US BankMts. Oct.14.2009 Misc 384283 and […]
Kathleen Engel, professor of law at Suffolk University, said the federal government should step in to help states deal with “toxic titles’’ that are clogging up the system from California to Florida. She said until recently few people were scrutinizing paperwork of foreclosing lenders, whose actions are causing problems for borrowers, investors, and municipalities. No […]
the use of nominees or straw men doesn’t mean they can be considered principals in the transaction anymore than your depository bank is a principal to a transaction in which you buy and pay for something with a check. The fact that the money was processed through your depository bank doesn’t make them party to […]


