Archives by Tag ' predatory lending '
Editor’s Note: The simple truth is this is a ruse. For most people they are under water at the beginning, in the middle and at the end. For most people they will not be able to maintain the payments and they will either fail or refuse to do so. Treasury is kidding itself if it […]
FYI – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became owned by and part of the United States on September 6, 2008 when FHA took them over. Consider the implications to any cause of action(s), constitutional or otherwise, and defenses, if the United States is a stock holder of MERS. In professor Christopher Peterson’s work entitled “FORECLOSURE, […]
THANK YOU TO Deontos: This is regarding “Standing” to obtain “Relief from Stay”. Riegle concluded MERS lacks “standing”. Stay tuned on this ……. It might really wreak havoc on the MERS menace in Nevada. EXCERPTED CASE FILE: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * * * * In re ) Case No. […]
FROM THE COMMENT SECTION THANK YOU ANDREW): I THINK HE’S GOT IT! There is no getting away from the fact that the lender is the investor and that anyone else whose name was inserted in the documentation did so not only without authority but as an intentional misrepresentation as part of a fraudulent scheme to […]
If the lawyer is not a competent witness with personal knowledge, then he should shut up and sit down. See also fraud-on-the-court-reversing-the-tide See also Judge Young: federal-appeal-slams-lawyers-and-pretender-lenders-with-sanctions-for-misrepresentation-on-ownership-of-loan See also modification-fraud-the-latest-game-in-town So you sent a QWR and you know the loan is securitized. The orignating lender says talk to the servicer and the servicer declines […]
Thank you Deontos Comment: I always thought TWO for the price of ONE was a GOOD thing. Everybody’s talking about the Kansas Appellate Decision? What about this one from Arkansas’s Supreme Court? Same issues, MERS and “black letter law” …. MERS **Lost** and the Arkansas Supreme Court cited the Landmark v KESLER Kansas Decision. ————————————————————— […]
If I am right, then why are judges are not buying this? see msnbc discussion of “What’s in the Bag?”> object> The problem here is becoming increasingly apparent with Judges of many different ideological persuasions. This all looks like a gimmick to them. And they are right. It’s just that the one finessing the gimmick […]
In order to revive securitization, taxpayers would have to absorb large risk. The social gains would be small, or perhaps even nonexistent. The best thing to do with the shattered Humpty-Dumpty of mortgage securitization would be to toss the broken pieces into the garbage. See Also Securitized Mortgages Are Illegal: Securitization Is ILLEGAL Should Mortgages […]
Thanks to Nye Lavalle for this Submission Editor’s Note: Tacit Procuration Available in Most States. Watch those procedural requirements on reversing foreclosure. The main procedural points are first file to reverse the sale alleging fraud etc. Second, have a court reporter present at any hearing if you need to appeal. In addition whether it is […]
The point must be made, and the evidence must be allowed, that the pretender lenders are gaming the system every day and literally stealing homes from both homeowners and investors who thought they had an interest in those homes when they bought mortgage backed securities. This leaves the borrower in a position of financial double […]


