Archives by Tag ' securitization '
Oct 9, 2009

Editor’s Note: The simple truth is this is a ruse. For most people they are under water at the beginning, in the middle and at the end. For most people they will not be able to maintain the payments and they will either fail or refuse to do so. Treasury is kidding itself if it […]

Oct 9, 2009

Editor’s Note: They just WON’T get it. Of course they will need a bailout because prices must continue to go down. Just look at the Schiller index that removes inflation from the price of housing and compares it to median income. A child could see where this is going and Washington is covering its eyes […]

Oct 6, 2009

FYI – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became owned by and part of the United States on September 6, 2008 when FHA took them over.  Consider the implications to any cause of action(s), constitutional or otherwise, and defenses, if the United States is a stock holder of MERS.  In professor Christopher Peterson’s work entitled “FORECLOSURE, […]

Oct 6, 2009

editor’s note: This is part of what we have been talking about. years down the road these bankers are looking to sue borrowers for deficiencies after people recover from the disaster the bankers caused. Also set to explode in a few years are title defects that are incurable resulting from the securitization of loans and incorrect […]

Oct 5, 2009

THANK YOU TO Deontos: This is regarding “Standing” to obtain “Relief from Stay”. Riegle concluded MERS lacks “standing”. Stay tuned on this ……. It might really wreak havoc on the MERS menace in Nevada. EXCERPTED CASE FILE: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * * * * In re ) Case No. […]

Oct 5, 2009

FROM OUR READER THANK YOU Gregory Montelaro: What is now beginning to surface are the losses attributed to the massive amount of fraud that mortgage originators created and passed on to Freddie Mac with two specific types of origination fraud know as “Double-Funding”, “Double Selling” or “Double Warehousing” fraud and Assignment Fraud. “Double-Funding” involves a […]

Oct 5, 2009

FROM THE COMMENT SECTION THANK YOU ANDREW): I THINK HE’S GOT IT! There is no getting away from the fact that the lender is the investor and that anyone else whose name was inserted in the documentation did so not only without authority but as an intentional misrepresentation as part of a fraudulent scheme to […]

Oct 2, 2009

If the lawyer is not a competent witness with personal knowledge, then he should shut up and sit down. See also fraud-on-the-court-reversing-the-tide See also Judge Young:  federal-appeal-slams-lawyers-and-pretender-lenders-with-sanctions-for-misrepresentation-on-ownership-of-loan See also modification-fraud-the-latest-game-in-town   So you sent a QWR and you know the loan is securitized. The orignating lender says talk to the servicer and the servicer declines […]

Sep 30, 2009

Thank you Deontos Comment: I always thought TWO for the price of ONE was a GOOD thing. Everybody’s talking about the Kansas Appellate Decision? What about this one from Arkansas’s Supreme Court? Same issues, MERS and “black letter law” …. MERS **Lost** and the Arkansas Supreme Court cited the Landmark v KESLER Kansas Decision. ————————————————————— […]

Sep 30, 2009

If I am right, then why are judges are not buying this? see msnbc discussion of “What’s in the Bag?”> object> The problem here is becoming increasingly apparent with Judges of many different ideological persuasions. This all looks like a gimmick to them. And they are right. It’s just that the one finessing the gimmick […]