Archive for 'expert witness' Category
Apr 20, 2010

Editor’s Note: Judges are quick to jump on the TILA Statute of Limitations by imposing the one year rule for rescission and damages. But there is more to it than that. First the statute does NOT cut off at one year except for items that are apparent on the face of the closing documentation; so […]

Apr 19, 2010

REGISTER NOW FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE WORKSHOP MAY 23-24 PRINCIPAL REDUCTION IS A RIGHT NOT A GIFT. IF THE OBLIGATION HAS BEEN PAID BY THIRD PARTIES, THEN THE OBLIGATION HAS ALREADY BEEN REDUCED. THE ONLY FUNCTION REMAINING IS TO DO THE ACCOUNTING. ” There should be no doubt in your mind now that virtually […]

Apr 16, 2010

see comp-pr2010-59 SEC Complaint V GS Fraud “The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest and civil penalties from both defendants.” Editor’s Note: Here is where the rubber meets the road. This same pool of illegal fraudulent profit is also subject to being defined as an undisclosed yield spread premium due to the […]

Apr 11, 2010

From Eaine B Editor’s Note: I have long advocated sending letters, objections to sale and complaints against “trustees” named (or substituted) on deeds of trust who initiate foreclosure proceedings. Indeed, it is highly probable that because of statutes attempting to protect the trustee from liability, the trustee is at best usually named only as a […]

Apr 11, 2010

“relief from the sale order is warranted by law whether there was an innocent mistake or deliberate concealment.” Editor’s Note: When you watch these events unfold, you might begin to realize that the windfall is not to the homeowner who gets the foreclosure thrown out of court, it already happened for the financial players who […]

Apr 7, 2010

harpster US BAnk Tossed Out for Failure to Respond to Discovery and Fraud Upon the Court Plaintiff has failed to produce answers to the Interrogatories for a period of 26 months, between the time the Interrogatories and the Request for Production were served on January 8, 2008 and the date of the hearing on the […]

Apr 7, 2010

REGISTER NOW FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE WORKSHOP (2006) Here is a case that should not have been filed (entire text of opinion below) and was argued improperly. The homeowners clearly lost because they put their eggs in the wrong basket. Nonetheless, the opinion is a pretty good compilation of the various statutes, rules and […]