Archives by Tag ' assignment of mortgage '
Every time a homeowner wins in foreclosure the investors are actually protected. It’s the sale of the property and/or entry of the foreclosure judgment that cuts investors off from their investment. Weird, right? An article in the recently published Florida Bar Journal illustrates perfectly the confusion that occurs within the courts and by lawyers when […]
Ryan Torrens, Esq., a Florida attorney who apparently does his homework, posted this article on his website. see Summary Judgment for Homeowner – Don’t give Up For those of you in foreclosure who may wonder if you have any rights, the answer is yes, you do! I recently won a summary judgment against a foreclosing bank […]
Lawyers, judges and homeowners are using different terms interchangeably thus muddying up the argument or ruling. An assignment refers to a mortgage whereas an endorsement (“indorsement” in legalese) refers to a note. The rules regarding enforcement of a mortgage are different than the enforcement of a note. Let us help you plan your foreclosure defense […]
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE FROM THE BRIEFS: “MERS Cannot be and in fact is not the beneficiary of the DOT. There is no named beneficiary in the SOT and ANY and ALL beneficiaries must be named in the SOT. Therefore the SOT (and consequently the NTS) is […]
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE SEE ALSO game-over-veal-case-vindicates-every-point-reported-on-livinglies EDITOR’S ANALYSIS: This case is corroboration of everything we have been saying — the Banks are making us live their lie. They don’t have the mortgages, the investors don’t want them, and the robosigning is euphemism for fraud, forgery and […]
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE USDC CA Central -Sacchi-v-Mers-La-11-Cv11-01658-Ahm-Cwx-w EDITOR’S NOTE: Every time a Court actually looks at the documents, examines the pleadings and exhibits and asks the most basic questions, they rule in favor of the borrower. It’s not out of bias that they ruled as they […]
SEE LIVINGLIES LITIGATION SUPPORT AT LUMINAQ.COM SEE ALSO MASSACHUSEETS SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENT EDITOR’S NOTE: The walls are closing in on the pretender lenders. The number of Judges that are insisting on applying the substantive, procedural law and rules and evidence is climbing rapidly. The allegation that the loan was transferred is put in factual […]
SEE LIVINGLIES LITIGATION SUPPORT AT LUMINAQ.COM EDITOR’S COMMENT: I’d like to see the expression of someone who sits on a Bar grievance committee that meets out discipline to lawyers, when they read this. In any situation, until the mortgage meltdown, if a lawyer signed documents and then presented them as his client’s “evidence” he would […]
SEE LIVINGLIES LITIGATION SUPPORT AT LUMINAQ.COM EDITOR’S NOTE: WISCONSIN COURT GETS IT: HEARSAY, PROOF, HOLDER NOT THE SAME AS CREDITOR, ETC. AFFIDAVIT THROWN OUT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE. In short everything we have been saying here was followed by the Court. Expect more decisions like this coming from other states. In other words, false […]
ONE ON ONE WITH NEIL GARFIELD COMBO ANALYSIS TITLE AND SECURITIZATION EDITOR’S COMMENT: Judge Curley has been wrestling with these issues for more than 2 years. She has heard every argument, seen every memorandum, Expert Declaration (mine) and considered everything else possible. She was led to the inescapable conclusion that BOA’s position was a farce. […]
Search Our Blog
Categories
Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339
Connect with us
Contact Our National Headquarters
- 844-583-5339
- Available 24/7
-
200 S. Andrews Ave. Ste. 604
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301