Archives by Tag ' foreclosure offense '
When BOA says it is a “Successor by merger” to Countrywide, it is no more true than Chase’s claims that it is the successor by merger to WAMU and no different than the false claims of OneWest as to IndyMac. In each instance there was a merger but in none of them were loans acquired […]
It seems obvious that if a complete stranger to the transaction (see the wording from the San Francisco study), is attempting to enforce a debt or seek a foreclosure, they should have no rights at all. And if a party accepts a modification application, they are making several representations about their authority and what they […]
For short-term results it is absolutely essential that discovery be pressed as hard as possible and that attorneys prep for a punishing cross examination of the corporate representative of the company claiming to be the servicer for the company that claims to be the trustee or successor for a trust that by implication claims to […]
Since it appears that Judges around the country are finding wiggle room where none exists, it may be wise to add the fraud charges to the initial complaint seeking enforcement of rescission, injunction, and quiet title. ================================ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE […]
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER. For an overview of our services: https://livinglies.me/2016/04/11/what-can-you-do-for-me-an-overview-of-services-offered-by-neil-garfield/ In yet another reminder that the people pushing foreclosures are neither “lenders” nor traditional “servicers,” the Montana Supreme Court upheld a $427,000 award against Bayview Loan Servicing (fronting […]
At no time were the Trusts anything but figments of the imagination of investment banks. As an exhibit to the alleged Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Mortgage Loan Schedule” appears to have legitimacy. Peel off one layer and it is an obvious fraud upon the court. The only reason the banks don’t allege holder in […]
In the final analysis nearly all foreclosures have been rubber-stamped based upon facts that are presumed to be true but which are untrue. * In my opinion every case lost by homeowners has been the result of the court using legal presumptions and shifting the burden of persuasion onto the homeowner who has been stonewalled, […]
Show me any other period in American history where banks lost so many cases. Schedule A Consult Now! https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to schedule, leave message or make payments. ================ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER. —————- see http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1664754.html The heat on the banks has […]
We start with the simple and irrefutable premise that if the parties are NOT in litigation, only a timely lawsuit filed by a party with legal standing could be considered to vacate the TILA rescission that is effective, as a matter of law, when it is mailed. The note and mortgage become void at that […]
A purchase and assumption agreement was not enough to prove JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s legal standing in a foreclosure case before the Fourth District Court of Appeal. —————— Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202753997800/JPMorgan-Chase-Loses-Foreclosure-Case-at-Fourth-DCA-After-5-Debt-Sales#ixzz45ulLI8CB —————— For a description of our services click here: https://wordpress.com/post/livinglies.wordpress.com/32498 Group Session- 90 Minute Roundtable Discussion =========================== THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL […]
Search Our Blog
Categories
Contact Our National Headquarters Phone: 844-583-5339
Connect with us
Contact Our National Headquarters
- 844-583-5339
- Available 24/7
-
200 S. Andrews Ave. Ste. 604
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301