The fact that the foreclosure players know — or even witnessed — the fact that you refused to make any further payments makes them a witness, not a claimant.  * The investment banks say they are not liable as lenders for noncompliance with lending laws. OK. A good lawyer can make a powerful argument for […]

Tags: single transaction doctrine, step transaction doctrine
Posted in discovery, Eviction, foreclosure defenses, foreclosure mill, legal standing, Motions, Pleading, securities fraud |

The current talking points used by the Banks is that somehow the Trust can enforce the alleged loan even though it is the “investors” who own the loan. But that can only be true if the Trust owns the loan which it doesn’t. And naming the “investors” as the creditor does nothing to clarify the […]

Tags: creditor, debt, DEBTOR, disclosure, fraud, liability, Mortgage Loan Schedule, PSA, single transaction doctrine, step transaction doctrine, trust
Posted in Uncategorized |

In the homeowner’s war, the battlefield is taking shape, A prime area of engagement is whether the securitization process represents a series of independent transactions (lender’s position) or that all the transactions should be aggregated (BORROWER’S POSITION) and treated as a single transaction. For reasons explained more fully below, it is our opinion that the […]

Tags: binding commitment test, end result test, foreclosure defense, interdependence test, seminar, single transaction, step transaction doctrine, worshop
Posted in Eviction |