Archives by Tag ' Truth in Lending Act '
APPRAISAL FRAUD IS THE ACT OF GIVING A RATING OR VALUE TO A HOME THAT IS WRONG — AND THE APPRAISER KNOWS IT IS WRONG. This can’t be performed in a vacuum because there are so many players who are involved. They ALL must be complicit in the deceit leading to the homeowner signing on […]
REGISTER NOW FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE WORKSHOP (2006) Here is a case that should not have been filed (entire text of opinion below) and was argued improperly. The homeowners clearly lost because they put their eggs in the wrong basket. Nonetheless, the opinion is a pretty good compilation of the various statutes, rules and […]
SEE The Economics and Incentives of Yield Spread Premiums and Credit Default Swaps March 23, 2010: Editor’s Note: The YSP/CDS paper is intentionally oversimplified in order to demonstrate the underlying economics of securitization as it was employed in the last decade. To be clear, there are several things I was required to do in order […]
Max Gardner’s Protoge Achieved This result as Reported Max’s Current Newsletter: Editor’s Note: Most of what we have seen reported indicates that although TILA is clear in is legislative expression that NO TENDER is required for the rescission remedy under TILA, Judges don’t like it. It seems they feel that Big Bad Borrowers are taking […]
The following is a short article written by a good lawyer from California who understands the advantages and uses of TILA, audits etc. It doesn’t address the forensic analysis of the ledgers of the mortgage servicer or the securitization process, but it does state eloquently the case for knowing what you are doing: TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT And […]
[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 12, Volume 3] [Revised as of January 1, 2007] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 12CFR226.4] [Page 269-271] TITLE 12–BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER II–FEDERAL […]


